wearewatchingyouman the programmer is a blind process, the darwinian algorithm. Schopenhauer talked about some kind of blind "Will" too.
jgnat indeed we are a kind of verb and not a noun. But I'm not a thinking, not a writing and not a speaking. We only relate to the verb to be. But what is a verb without a noun? What is an object without a subject? Or a subject without objects?
frankiespeakin yes I like Jung. Do you know about MBTI? I'm typed as an INTP. Very interesting stuff.
punkofnice if there's some duality between object and subject, it's hard to say what is reality. But I tend to privilege the subjective view of reality.
What could be the objective reality without a subject? But if the subject is a thing in itself why the hell it needs to manifest in an objective world? Reality seems to be more consistent if you take dreams as reality. I think we just dismiss dreams as being the main reality because we do not have free will in dreams. But even without free will the dreams can be very pleasant. That's makes me wonder why worry about the existence of free will. Dreams prove to us that we can be very happy without free will. But just imagine dreams with free will? Man, I think that's the true reality: free will conscious in a dream! LOL
If someday (some says in 2045) we achieve to know how to upload our minds to a programmable substrate (computronium) we will be able to creat (hyper realistic) virtual environments to live. If the technological singularity is possible, we'll reach that reality. I hope so.