women should go back to the kitchen

by never a jw 27 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • never a jw
    never a jw

    I found on another thread a quote from Awake 1967 Aug 22,page 27-28. It's from an article where the WT proves that women should acquiesce to their husbands. Within the article I found something that suggests more intellectual dishonesty from the WT writers.

    That it is in the best interests of both

    sexes for man to take the lead is also supported

    by psychological evidence. One of

    New York city's leading psychiatrist<; and

    psychoanalysts, Dr. Marie N. Robinson, in

    one of her books, which deals with certain

    frustrations of married women, skillfully

    demonstrates by case histories that

    many of these particular frustrations can

    be ended if women will but recognize the

    fact that the way their bodies are made

    gives evidence that it is intended for man

    to be the head. As she expresses it, women

    must learn the art of "eternal acquiescence"

    and "deep altruism" in dealing with

    their husbands if they want to find happiness.

    I found it extremely suspicious how the WT uses the quotation marks around just two pairs of words leaving out very likely the essence of the intended message of Dr. Marie N. Robinson.

  • never a jw
    never a jw

    More evidence of the WT "thesis", which is supported by 1 Timothy 2:12, a book that most scholar agree was not written by the apostle Paul, but somehow managed to get in the Bible Canon.

    "I Do Not Permit A Woman to Excercise Authority over a Man - Why?" August 22, 1967 AWAKE!

    The female skull is lighter and its cranial capacity is about 10 percent smaller that that of the male...True, mere brain size in itself is not as important as brain quailty, but where the brain quality is the same the larger brain has an advantage. ...Implicit in these findings is that man is advantaged by a greater sized brain...women must learn the art of 'eternal acquiescence' and 'deep altruism' in dealing with their husbands if they want to find happiness."

  • skin
    skin

    Another reason why the WT CD rom only goes back to the 1970 edition of the Awake.

  • gma-tired2
    gma-tired2

    No Thank You, I'm too independant, I have a brain and I use it. My husband says he is lucky to have me. Married 48 years in July.

  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    frustrations can be ended if women will but recognize the fact that the way their bodies are made gives evidence that it is intended for man to be the head.

    And just what exactly is it about "the way their bodies are made" that "gives evidence that it is intended for man to be the head"?

    More pseudo-scientific sophistry cherry-picked by the misogynist leaders of the WTBTS to prop up their chauvinism with the appearance of "evidence."

    Where is the evidence? I want evidence! I demand to see some evidence. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!

    Evidently, there isn't any!

    Let's review: It's a cult!

  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    How about this argument: The way a man's body is made, that is--he is generally stronger than the woman--, gives evidence that he should be her slave and do all the hard work.

    Such stupidity.

  • Iown Mylife
    Iown Mylife

    LOL! The way women's bodies are made give evidence they should be enslaved by the other gender!

    Women's bodies have brains - maybe if they did not, this submission to the male crap might make a bit of sense.

    Humans are humans, each one owns their own life. Humans are not property to be owned by anyone.

    Oh lor', i feel my blood pressure going up, -whew!!!

    Marina

  • never a jw
    never a jw

    The following is some sort of review of the book I found in another site. Pretty much supports WT mentality, except that the context of the book was sexuality, something the WT writer leaves out in the 1967 article. This commentary gives an idea about the contents of the book The Power of Sexual Surrender. I must say that the WT was not, or is not, very different from other fundamentalist religions.

    "The Power of Sexual Surrender May 29, 2002 Marie N. Robinson MD, a Cornell educated psychiatrist devoted her New York City practice to the treatment of frigidity. Her small book, The Power of Sexual Surrender (1958) is the sanest work on feminine psychology ever written. In a world where thousands of self-help books are published, this eloquent guide to sexual health and happiness is out of print. The reason? It is politically incorrect. Dr. Robinson writes that a woman's identity lies in an "essential feminine altruism." A woman's self-expression and power is based on making her husband and children her first priority. Similarly, her sexual satisfaction and spiritual fecundity depend on self-surrender. Robinson says men and women are different by nature. Men are designed for mastery of the external (physical) world, and women for mastery of the internal (spiritual) world and the home. These are not social stereotypes, as feminists argue. "Women are designed for duties different from those of the marketplace, another kind of stress entirely," writes Robinson. They "tend to lose their essential womanliness if they stay [in the marketplace] by choice." (149) Dr. Robinson says that millions of American women suffer from frigidity. While she explores many complex causes in detail, she notes that frigid women universally adopt the feminist view. This view (that men exploit woman and a career as a wife and mother is demeaning) creates an "emotional logjam" that impedes sexual response and psychological development. According to Robinson, modern women have an identity crisis because they think they are no longer needed as women. Before the industrial revolution, the home was the center of all life and a woman was the indispensable center of the home. She prepared clothing and food, reared and trained the children and helped with farm tasks. The industrial revolution seemed to make women obsolete. Everything could be bought in stores. The home was empty. Children went to school, husbands to work. Children were not needed and were even considered a liability. Woman's response was to turn against her own femininity. Mary Wollstonecraft launched feminism with her book Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792). Proclaiming that women were identical to men, she dedicated feminism to the achievement of maleness in women. According to Robinson, "the feminist credo thoroughly discredited feminine needs and characteristics and substituted male goals for female goals."(53) The other response to the industrial revolution was not feminist, but "Victorian" but it also rejected femininity. Robinson says Victorian women took "revenge" on men by denying women had any sexual feelings. They "were amazingly successful in convincing men in general and even the scientists of the day that frigidity was indeed a basic attribute of the female." (54) Thus, feminists and Victorian women laid the foundations for modern female neurosis. "The depreciation of the goals of femininity, biological and psychological, became part and parcel of the education of millions of American girls. Homemaking, childbearing and rearing, cooking, the virtues of patience, lovingness, givingness in marriage, have been systematically devalued. The life of male achievement has been substituted for the life of female achievement." (55) The feminist-Victorian antagonism to men was handed down from mother to daughter so that "to millions of women, hostility towards the opposite sex seems almost a natural law. Although many a modern women may pay lip service to the ideal of a passionate and productive marriage to a man, underneath she deeply resents her role, conceives of the male as fundamentally hostile to her, as an exploiter of her. She wishes in her deepest heart, and often without the slightest awareness of the fact, to supplant him, to exchange roles with him." (emphasis mine, 56) Robinson says that women have blamed their problems on the outside world instead of looking within for the real problem and the real solution. She says that if feminism had brought women happiness in relationships or careers, the game might have been worth it. "But it hasn't been. The game has brought frigidity and restlessness and a soaring divorce rate, neurosis, homosexuality, juvenile delinquencyall that results when a woman in any society deserts her true function." (56) Dr. Robinson writes that once the emotional "log jam" is removed, a woman's natural instincts will flow and health will be restored. Essentially this involves "allowing herself to trust her husband in a very deep sense. It means that she finally realizes that she no longer has to fear or oppose his strength, but that she can rely on it to protect her, to give her the secure climate necessary for the full flowering of her femininity." (153) On the other hand, the woman who mistrusts her husband's love and, as a consequence, her own femininity has a "difficult, painful, frenetic" approach to life. She is at war with herself. In bed, she has to feel "in control all the time." For a profound vaginal orgasm, Robinson writes, "the excitement comes from the act of surrender. There is a tremendous surging physical ecstasy in the yielding itself, in the feeling of being the passive instrument of another person..." (158) Robinson regards the clitoris as a masculine vestige. She implies that even if a woman is sexually active and mechanically adept she may still be frigid. Feminine sexuality depends on "absolute trust" in a man, which enables a woman to fully receive and fully respond. Dr. Robinson believes that there is nothing in life as important as love. Marriage is the key to our development as human beings. It is through this relationship that the power of love is felt in the world. "Love means, in its very deepest sense union; union between individuals...It is the most basic and profound urge we have and its power for good is illimitable... the lover partner becomes as important as oneself...This fact is why real love never leads to domination or to a struggle for power..." (129) The significance of The Power of Sexual Surrender is profound. By coercing women to abandon their femininity and usurp the male role, feminism throws a spanner in the natural heterosexual mechanism of humanity. The consequences are dire. Millions of women are condemned to emotional and physical isolation. Similarly, men are deprived of the role of protector and provider essential to their psychological development and fulfillment. The triumph of such a manifestly wrongheaded ideology, and the suppression of the truth, signifies that control in the world has passed to a malignant force. As I have shown in previous articles an amoral elite power fosters feminism as part of a long-term agenda to dislodge western civilization from its religious and cultural moorings. The tax-exempt foundations, the elite media, the CIA and the Communist Party of the USA are all behind the promotion of sexual dysfunction in the guise of feminism. The purpose is to destroy the nuclear family, decrease population, stunt human development and destabilize society. Our government is part of this elite agenda that aims to create a materialist, fascist "New World Order". Feminists who oppose the NWO are unwitting agents of it. Finally, where does this leave the female "identity crisis"? Men and women must be free to find fulfillment in any way they please. A woman can have a career. Robinson's work suggests that a woman need not give up her femininity if her career takes second place to her love of husband and family. The world (men women and child alike) is starved for the feminine principle: beauty, grace, love. This article could as easily have been titled: "Wanted: A Few Good Women." - See more at: http://www.savethemales.ca/290502.html#sthash.rfkBljeG.dpuf"

  • jam
    jam

    Why does Beyonce sing "To the left, to the left", because women

    have no right.

    Why did the woman cross the road? She didn't, she's in the kitchen.

    OK, I thought it was funny.

  • Iown Mylife
    Iown Mylife

    Well dang, i would fer shore head on back to the kitchen and cook up a big ol' mess o' sumpin', if it's gonna cause my "femininity to flower," yeehaw! Only trouble is, everybody wants to eat out.

    Seriously, this baloney makes me sick!

    Marina

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit