two Jehovah’s Witnesses were paid millions to restrict WA blood transfusions

by Watchtower-Free 17 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • rebel8
    rebel8

    It happened in Australia.

  • Gypsy Sam
    Gypsy Sam

    Marked.

  • Listener
    Listener

    It would be very interesting to read what was in their reports. As JWs they could never recommend the provision of blood, even at a reduction, under any circumstances. So their reports could not show that reductions should be made here or there, their only conclusion would be that there should be no provision of blood.

    I wonder if the two JWs mentioned this before they were selected.

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4Nmjg29p0

    Could this video have to do with this?

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    OMG!!

    Unbelievable!! Yes it has to do with Patient Blood Management...

    Unreal!!

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    OMG!!

    Unbelievable!! Yes it has to do with Patient Blood Management...

    Unreal!!

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Bttt... Please watch the video!! It is watchtower-style propaganda but now being given to the public through a government agency!!

  • hamsterbait
    hamsterbait

    The sublingual footage of the guy with GI haemorrage, doesnt explain WHY the blood was not circulating well after the transfusion. What were the facts of his case.

    This is propaganda to save money, and reduce transfusions due to shortages.

    There is still no efffective substitute, and as stated by the BMA your chances of dying due to a transfusion related problem is now LESS than being killed by lightning.

    They should be doing something about the thousands of people dying from drugs alcohol and smoking, which far exceeds those who die after a transfusion - many of these are already so seriously ill there is no proof that they died directly as a result of the blood cells given them.

    Remember too that the Witchtower loves to talk of bloodless surgery and surviving it - most surgeons would not even consider bloodless surgery unless the patient had a good blood count already. And now that witlesses are suing doctors who do bloodless and the patient dies (see other threads on this) they will be even less willing to put their career of saving lives on the line.

    Sometimes there is NO CHOICE but to use blood.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit