WT edit to Wiki (page 3)

Violia

Sooner . lol . You know I have seen things like that in other wiki pages. I follow a certain musican and someone edited the page with things a bit more subtle , but as a fan I know they are taking a shot at them.

sir82

I seriously doubt that the WTS spend its time editing Wiki.

It is far more likely that there are wild-eyed JW zealots whose whole life revolves around "proving the JWs are right" and view it as their personal assignment from God himself to defend him.

Poor Jehovah - can't keep the Wiki page on himself straight, so he relies on Brother Obese N. Greasy living in his parents' basement to defend his honor.

Vidiot

suavojr - "How come Islam, Christianity, Jesus, Catholics, JW's and politics need so many revisions?"

No matter how much they may deny it...

...on a fundamental level, "being right" is the most important thing to ideology-driven people; therefore, any suggestion that an aspect of that ideology may be "wrong" is percieved as an attack that must be defended against at any cost.

Londo111

I'm suprised Scientology came in at 98. I thought they were much higher of the Wikipedia revisioning list. Maybe it's a sign of a cult in rapid retreat.

steve2

Sooner, poor spelling is at work; it's "cite" not "site".

problemaddict

It always amazes me how the JW sites, discussion boards, and more, always seem to come in second. For being a pretty small religion down the totem pole, they sure do create controversy. Of course, back in the day I would have taken that to mean we were special, a target, and that Satan wants to hold back truth from getting out there.

What a fool I was.

WT edit to Wiki