Venus Williams ESPN Nude Religious Controversy

by ChuckFire 20 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • ChuckFire
    ChuckFire

    Venus Williams ESPN Nude Religious Controversy

    By Mike Tuttle

    June 24, 2014

    Article Source: http://www.webpronews.com/venus-williams-espn-nude-religious-controversy-2014-06?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+(WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed)

    Venus Williams is posing nude for the 2014 issue of ESPN Body. Usually an announcement like that would be pretty normal fare when it comes to sports celebrities. Williams joins dozens of other sports stars who have posed nude or semi-nude for the annual magazine, out since 2009.

    But Venus Williams’ appearance in the buff may warrant a closer look. The very first edition of Body, in 2009, featured her sister Serena, also nude. All the nudes for Body magazine are tastefully done. But the Williams sisters are raising eyebrows for their appearance for one simple reason.

    The Williams sisters are Jehovah’s Witnesses. To anyone familiar with the Witness belief structure, this will cause some raised eyebrows. Jehovah’s Witnesses have a strict in-house judicial structure that would bring sanctions, including expulsion and shunning, down upon rank and file members who did something like pose nude for a magazine.

    But Venus Williams doesn’t seem concerned. In fact, in this video feature about the nude appearance, she even mentions how her spirituality helps her in her life. She does not mention Jehovah’s Witnesses by name, but that is her affiliation.

    Williams has also spoken in interviews in the past about her sex life. But she is unmarried. This is also something that would ordinarily result in the expulsion of a Witness member.

    Are the Witnesses giving celebrities like Venus and Serena Williams a pass for their infractions? The answer may lie in how the Jehovah’s Witness structure works.

    The Witnesses were formed in Pennsylvania in the late 1800′s by a religious writer named Charles Russell. He wrote books that claimed to interpret prophetic passages in the Bible, including using occult pyramidology practices in combination with Bible verses to predict the future.

    Russell recruited people from among his readers into study groups and organized them into sales teams to promote his books. To this day, individual members of Jehovah’s Witnesses are still called “publishers”, hearkening back to this setup.

    When Russell died, a large organization called the Watchtower Society continued to handle distribution of his many books, magazines, and tracts. The group used volunteer labor from among the faithful to do the printing, and still do to this day.

    The company elected a new president who changed many things about the fledgling religion, including doing away with birthday celebrations, holidays, voting and military service, and instituting a top-down authority structure that still exists. Many people left. But the group survived, and that is what Jehovah’s Witnesses are today.

    But one tenet of the Witness faith that comes to bear in the Williams sisters’ situation is that Witnesses are only beholden to the Watchtower organization once they have been baptized into the church. At the baptism ceremony, they vow loyalty to the Governing Body of the corporation.

    The Witness Governing Body is a council of seven men who rule from Witness Headquarters in Brooklyn, New York. This Governing Body is the source of all doctrine and judicial direction for the church. Its members are appointed for life, though three men have resigned over the years, some of whom went on to write tell-all books about the secret meetings of the council.

    Apparently, the Williams sisters, although they self-identify as Jehovah’s Witnesses, have never been baptized. Therefore, they are not, technically, members. And, therefore can not be put out according to traditional Witness judicial procedures.

    So, Venus and Serena Williams are free to do whatever they like, just like the rest of the world. And they can claim to be Jehovah’s Witnesses. Many Witnesses like to point out that they count the Williams sisters among their number, as well as other celebs like Prince, bassist Larry Graham, and singer/guitarist George Benson.

    But the Williams have a loophole.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UztstNJBbnU

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Ha, interesting. I guess if they haven't been sanctioned by now, esp. with Serena already appearing in nude poses, then this won't do it either. But was Michael Jackson baptized? And they still sanctioned him over "Thriller". Then again, that was a bigger deal than anything the Williams sisters have done.

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    I think Michael Jackson was baptized. I am under the impression that the Williams sisters are not baptized. However, if they are UBPublishers, they could be removed as such.

    I believe there is a larger percentage of African Americans who are JWs vs their percentage of the general population. I would wonder if the WTS is concerned about rocking the boat of the AA celebrities without good cause -- or any celebrity for that matter. Like Tom Cruise brings interest to Scientology, so too, celebrities bring interest to whatever "cause" they take on, even crazy religions.

    Doc

  • HappyDad
    HappyDad

    They are disgusting! They are two big butt idiots. But the WTBTS are even bigger idiots with more than "double" standards.

    HappyDad

  • NotNew
    NotNew

    I went to Walmart and seen more and much nicer...I'm just saying...almost as much at the kHall

    SW

  • disposable hero of hypocrisy
    disposable hero of hypocrisy

    That's an interesting and concise summary of the history, we'll done that writer.

    I wonder how much offense would be taken if I posted this on my Facebook wall?

  • leaving_quietly
    leaving_quietly

    Ha ha ha... the "vow loyalty to the Governing Body of the corporation" links here to JWN!

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Well, if the story blows up, maybe she'll just be 'de-published', as I like to call it. Who knows? Someday she could be on JWN, huh? Nah. Probably not...

    --sd-7

  • Gypsy Sam
    Gypsy Sam

    I'm thinking this is a post worthy Facebook article, with just a WOW comment and leave it at that. I stiil have a few JW's on my page. Who knows? Maybe one will read it through and start wondering...

  • Juan Viejo2

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit