Those of us, who still had to attend the convention this year, for whatever reason, might remember the talk given about the difference between human rulers and the kingdom since 1914.
Sure, one can find many flaws with human rulership, and paint a picture of the perfect rule of Gods kingdom in a Paradise, literal and even spiritual right now (whatever this means)
But, here is another aspect:
Human rulers, especially in modern western democrazies, manage to keep most people reasonable happy, healthy and well fed. Granted, even there some suffer from injustice, corruption and so forth, most subjects ususally are law abiding citizens more or less. Of course, there are always some, who defy any law, and have to be treated either with imprisonment or similar measures, but those are comparingly few. Most people just want to live in peace, and even if they may not agree with all the government does, remain calm, if basis needs are not touched.
If a government has to use brutal force in order to keep most citizens under control, we usually few it as big failure
Gods kingdom, on the other hand, even has access to supernatural powers (example preventing sickness, even death) and still cannot keep in control 99,9% of worlds population, but has to kill them in the big A.
Gods kingdom superior ? really ???
