Are police entitled to use deadly force for a "mouthing off" unarmed kid?
I doubt you have all the facts. I know i don't, but I can tell you that I have a hard time understanding this fairytale scenario that some people have dreamt up to cause such outrage.
So let me see if i get this right. This youngman was simply walking down the street, a cop pulls up, pulls a gun on him, the young man raises his hands and the cop just shoots him? Am i supposed to believe this? I know i don't.
After seeing the video of the convenience store, and the way this bully pushed away a defenseless store owner and walked out with cigarettes, i'm pretty sure things went a slightly different way. I find it reasonable to believe that when the cop pulled up and tried to secure the scene, this thug (YES THUG), became combative and the cop had no choice but to get physical to arrest him. This guy seemed to be pretty big, so if there was a struggle, the cop was probably in serious trouble especially if this THUG was reaching for this gun. The cop at the point of exhaustion, likely drew his gun and took a shot most likely at the same time as this THUG realized that now he should back off.
If this "pillar of society" had not stolen cigarettes or had been humble enough to realize he was caught when the police pulled up, instead of fighting them, he would be alive.
I don't care if what i'm saying is not popular, i'm not racist, but I am civilized and I have little tolerance for people who refuse to abide by the rules of a civilized society. If this THUG was white, he would have been shot just the same, and my opinion would be equal.