I would attribute the teaching about PARADISE ON EARTH to the writings of early church father PAPIAS.
The reign of Christ, however was 10,000 YEARS and not one thousand!
Papias made it his business to hunt down all living Apostles he could find in order to interview them.
What is amazing about the stuff he obtained was how WILD it was.
It was so off-the-charts, these writings had to be disbelieved by the nascent Catholic Church.
Papias was blamed for the craziness of the Apostle's responses!!
__________________
Eusebius defamed Papias this way:
“Papias is a man of small mental capacity who mistook the figurative language of apostolic traditions
Why the cutting remarks? Eusebius did not believe in a ten Millennial reign by Christ, especially upon the earth that would usher in a paradise. So, Eusebius bad-mouthed him when Papias quoted the followers of Jesus as having taught this very thing.
Eusebius says:
Among which he says that there will be a period of some ten thousand years after the resurrection, and that the
kingdom of Christ will be set up in material form on this earth. These ideas I suppose he got through a
misunderstanding of the apostolic accounts, not perceiving that the things recorded there in figures were spoken by
them mystically.
Fortunately, Eusebius quoted some of Papius’ writings and we can stitch together what he said about certain things, such as:
“Mark having become the interpreter of Peter, wrote down accurately whatsoever he remembered. It was not, however, in exact order that he related the sayings or deeds of Christ. For he neither heard the Lord nor accompanied Him. But afterwards, as I said, he accompanied Peter, who accommodated his instructions to the necessities [of his hearers], but with no intention of giving a regular narrative of the Lord's sayings. Wherefore Mark made no mistake in thus writing some things as he remembered them. For of one thing he took especial care, not to omit anything he had heard, and not to put anything fictitious into the statements. Matthew put together the oracles [of the Lord] in the Hebrew language, and each one interpreted them as best he could.”
The New Testament had ZERO books written in Hebrew, by the way. All were Greek.