If finding Mike and Kim not to my taste is "bashing" them, then I stand accused.
However, according to the more conventional definitions of the word I haven't bashed them.
Besides, the "aim" among ex-JWs has never been to have a "united" approach (which would be a worrying carry-over from the organization) - and I concede their energized approach will appeal to some.
Also, if you are courageous enough to put your claims out there on youtube, you need also to be prepared for people having varied reactions to it - especially if you make certain claims.
Youtube is perfectly clear about the consequences of copyright beaches. if you lift copyrighted videos from others for your presentations expect sooner or later to get clear warnings from Youtube - and if you persist, to be banned. It ain't persecution and it ain't an indication of your power and influence. Sheesh!
It actually has very little to do with the organization hovering over the internet - although even if it did, it would not be the first organization to be concerned about the ease with which all manner of negative claims can be made by anyone anywhere. The fact that so very much anti-JW material is on the web is proof that the organization's lawyers ain't shutting down websites and Youtube videos in the absence of copyright infringements.
As stated, the couple are not to my taste, but long may they have one of the many, many "roles" of reaching people about the dangers of belonging to a religious organisation that frowns upon critical thinking.