SATURDAY: 3 LATEST SILENTLAMBS NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

by AngryXJW 15 Replies latest social current

  • AngryXJW
    AngryXJW

    Posted on Sat, May. 25, 2002

    Marshall rally targets sex-abuse policy of Jehovah's Witnesses

    CHURCH LEADERS DENY WRONGDOING, DEFEND EXPULSIONS

    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    BENTON - A former Jehovah's Witnesses elder who faces expulsion from the church for speaking out against its handling of sex-abuse allegations rallied with others yesterday in front of the Marshall County courthouse.

    Bill Bowen, 44, of Draffenville, and his supporters claim child-abuse allegations are not typically reported to authorities by the Jehovah's Witnesses because of the church's policy of handling problems internally.

    He resigned his elder position in December 2000 to protest the church's policy.

    Church leaders have denied wrongdoing.

    A hearing was scheduled last night to determine if Bowen would be disfellowshipped -- or excommunicated -- from the church for sowing discord in the faith by speaking out against the church's handling of allegations of child molestation. It was uncertain whether an immediate decision would be made after the hearing.

    Members of the church are required to shun those who are disfellowshipped, even if they are members of their own family.

    Three others who have spoken out against the church's policies have been disfellowshipped in recent weeks. They are Barbara Anderson, of Normandy, Tenn., and Carl and Barbara Pandelo, of Belmar, N.J.

    "Something is wrong," Bowen said.

    "Victims should not be punished."

    Tema Smith-Bosken, of Cincinnati, a church member who said she was molested by a family member, was one of about two dozen people who stood in support of Bowen yesterday.

    "A lot of people are questioning the motives of the individuals who are coming forward," Smith-Bosken said. "We're just a bunch of people with big hearts who are strong enough to come forward on the hope, just the hope, that something will change. I know my talking .. will put me in the line of fire."

    J.R. Brown, a spokesman for the denomination, has said that parents are not punished by the church for going to the police first in cases of child molestation.

    He also said members found guilty of molestation by a church judicial committee are removed from all positions of responsibility and cannot evangelize door-to-door without being accompanied by a fellow Jehovah's Witness.

    © 2001 kentucky and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
    http://www.kentucky.com

    . http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/3334547.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    "J.R. Brown, a spokesman for the denomination, has said that parents are not punished by the church for going to the police first in cases of child molestation."

    why does he include the word "first?" Does this mean that they are punished by the church for going to the police "after" speaking to elders?

    path, I don't recall ever reading the "readjust the thinking" scripture. I recall seeing scriptures referring to "unclean thoughts" but I'm not familiar with "readjust the thinking." where can I find it so that I can read it in full context?

    "...most Witnesses do not want blood and this is their choice not to have it."

    I totally agree, if a Witness, including the one that will leave a child behind, decide, on his or her own accord, to die for an organization's interpretations of the Bible, that's his or her decision.
    What bothers me, and the courts, are cases in which minors, and those under "undue influence," are involved. It is these cases in which the parent trys to prevent a transfusion by claiming the minor is competent to make such a decision. It is also these cases, as well as cases brought against doctors BY Witnesses, in which the courts are interested if there was any "undue influence" or if the decision was indeed, "their own."

    I still believe that an organization that practices any form of "readjusting the thinking," of anyone, for any reason, scriptural or not, could be described as an "undue influence."

  • plmkrzy
    plmkrzy

    The emportant thing is people are paying attention


    Life sucks...get a helmet
    [email protected]
  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    I agree Plum

    but I'm still curious as to where the
    "scriptural term," "readjust the thinking"
    can be found in the Bible.....

  • deddaisy
  • deddaisy
    deddaisy

    I don't know WHAT I did to the above post, I'll try once more....

    "The term 'readjust one's thinking' is a scriptural term and as a religion, JWs are allowed to interpret it as they see fit within the framework of the law."
    Pathofthorns

    Path, or anyone else who may know, could you please reference this "scriptural" term?

    "JWs are allowed to interpret it as they see fit within the framework of the law."
    Is this case law ?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit