If a parrot spoke to Eve instead of a serpent??
by jam 38 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
OnTheWayOut
It is easy for the true believer to accept that God (or the devil) can work through animals and make them talk.
It is easy for the true believer to accept a virgin pregnant with the son of God.
It is easy for the true believer to accept all kinds of violations of science to bring about the worldwide flood and cramming all the "kinds" into an ark.No, it's not just the snake part of the story. It's the fact that mankind is older than 10,000 years old and the Bible doesn't explain Neanderthals and Homo Erectus and all those other fossils, let alone the dinosaurs. And that everything else in Genesis/Exodus is in violation of science and/or evidence found.
-
jam
So that's why no one has come forward. LOL
-
Apognophos
I'am surprised that no one has come forward and say, that
is the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard, a talking parrot.
I wonder why..
Ah, now I get your game, so you were going somewhere with this after all.
Incidentally, parrots are much better speakers than monkeys. Why on earth is that?
-
jam
Apognophos: Maybe we are looking at the wrong species that
is closer to man.LOL
"Ah, now I get your game". Yes I can come up with some crazy stories
like the best of them. I have that kind of a mind and I don't
do drugs, crazy thinking....
-
NewYork44M
Does this parrot wear an eye patch? I think this variation of parrot instead of snake would add a bit of humor to the episode. And, humor is a good thing.
If the parrot was part of the episode would that mean that parrots would lose their wings? Didn't the snake lose his/her legs in this transaction that changed human history?
-
jam
Does the parrot wear an eye patch. Funny.
-
Black Sheep
Parrots wouldn't have legs or wings.
-
smiddy
What if it was a Monty Python parrot ? Now that would definetly change my thinking .
smiddy
-
punkofnice
Look Daddy, there's Polly!
No darling, he's been bound for a thousand years!
