Deceiving statements in The Watchtower (Study Edition) September 2015

by opusdei1972 12 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    "Jehovah" didn't say Jack-shit about blood transfusions or blood fractions, and he sure as shit didn't say a damn thing about major "components" in blood!

    This is legalistic spin to absolve the WTBTS Inc. of any and all responsibility, while simultaneously allowing them control over the R&F.

    The WTBTS cannot admit to having coerced an untold number of R&F to their deaths by following man-made "scriptural" commands concerning blood. Neither can they legally force a R&F to obey the cult dogma, and they don't want any paper trail in that regard.

    So what's a cult to do? Revise your history, spin the information, make it a confusing as possible, say it's Gods word and make the R&F believe it was their own free will and "reasoning" that caused them to obey.

    GB 3.0 ( Non-anointed GB helpers ) can move forward without any legal entanglements, but can still coerce the R&F to obey dogma in the name of Jehovah-sock-puppet-thought form-tax write off McDouche.

    DD

  • Mephis
    Mephis
    DATA-DOG's nailed it for me. Beyond the hypocrisy, beyond the sudden urge to seek greater control with the blood issue, there is the legal issue of being held responsible for enforcing their bizarre views on blood transfusions. Helps with getting recognised as a religion in some countries, helps avoid law suits in others.
  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    Classic manipulation: "We don't make rules, however .... "

    Let's review: It's a cult!



Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit