Oub,
I just meant that we cannot walk up to a GB member and cross-examine them. I can't make an Elder answer anything truthfully. They always deflect and threaten to skirt the issue. I remember Jaracz making a curt remark to a reporter before running away.
The Walsh trial showed what happens when a GB member is put on the stand. There is no way in hell the GB want a repeat of those events. I can't make an Elder or GB member engage in a discussion against their will. I can't take them into the back room, but a lawyer can.
DD