Wal-Mart, which pays a top wage of $12.00+ to its full-time employees, is under attack, once again, by its employees and those who would like to unionize them.
I can't speak to the USA, but here in Canada, most Wal-Mart employees are not full time. It is mostly a part-time employer, so ZERO benefits. In my opinion, that makes the $12.00+ look a lot smaller when you envision the actual paycheque. We are talking a maximum of 30 hours/week, and here, they make $10.00/hour.
Here's the article from Reuters, and a quote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/14/us-walmart-labor-idUSKCN0IY1RU20141114
(and I have to shake my head in amazement at the quote, which is a blatant lie **)
Asked about the workers' complaints, Wal-Mart spokeswoman Brooke Buchanan said the company does not retaliate against workers who strike or protest.
Thoughts? Wal-Mart is the biggest employer in America. So a lot of 'adults' (ie, not students, for example) live on a Wal-Mart wage.
My own choice is to support the protesters and boycott ... which is what I've done since the stores opened here.
tal
** Check out the well-documented case in Quebec. The employees *did* unionize, and guess what happened? There is a documentary about this case as well, which is either by the CBC or the NFB.
Here's the story from the Bloomberg Press, in detail.
http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2006-02-12/no-union-please-were-wal-mart