My question is prompted by a post of Terry's on his own thread about a parable for JW's.
In that post Terry shows how the standard JW response to any report of Sex Abuse within the Borg is to use the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.
i.e "He was not a real JW".
My question is for some time in the future, when the true, horrendous, extent of Abuse within the Borg is public knowledge, and the Cognitive Dissonance grows for JW's about this being endemic in "God's Organization" for so long, how will they excuse it, or explain it, then ?
How will they push away the obvious conclusion that Jehovah must have approved of this going on, or He would have rectified it, not left it to the Courts to pick up the broken pieces years later ?