I got to thinking the other day about how the WT uses loaded language
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.
But why not call a spade a spade. Why not identify the true nature of a policy,
action or behavior, the intent behind it. So, for instance, if we are being honest
*disfellowshipped = emotional balckmail, J-snubbed, hit with the shun-gun,
the "you are dead to me" treatment
*deleted = disgraced former elder
*The two witness rule= pedo loophole
*Judicial Committee=kangaroo court, a prosecution only trial, where the
prosecuting team are prosecuting attorney, jury and sentencing judge all in one.
*worldly= marked for destruction unless commits to lifelong GB worship.
These are just a few I could think of for the sake of example,but what about you,
do you think the language used has any bearing on how we view things?
Does calling it what it is help expose the true intent behind WT policies?
Spin of all kinds is nothing new, so I suppose what I am talking about here
is reverse-spin.
