Ex-J-dubs have to be very cautious of confirmation bias.
When I was working at Half-Price books in the religion section I began to notice a trend.
Debunking books were followed by apologist books.
Each respective side remained convinced.
All I would urge is that Ex-JW's read BOTH sides of each argument to remain aware of ALL the particulars.
Why?
If you get into a discussion and you don't know what ammunition the other side has--you can be whipsawed.
Remember, intellectual honesty is the willingness to be wrong when presented with the facts.
_________________
When academics (experts) disagree and each side has credentials, I have to back out of a debate because I'm not
as smart as either party. My bias pushes me too far in a certain direction. I would easily allow myself to become
convinced of the argument which emotionally satisfies me.