It is only mainstream writers to argue how evolution should
be perceived by creationist. Theology in itself aligns to the core value of
what a Heavenly God is and attributes there in.
Evolutionist such a Darwin made this compelling argument to satisfy
the science community how such differences would apply to the onset forecast
within the logic of creationism.
Microevolution happens on a small
scale (within a single population), while macroevolution happens on a
scale that transcends the boundaries of a single species. Despite their
differences, evolution at both of these levels relies on the same, established
mechanisms of evolutionary change: mutation.
There are two possible sources of the genetic variability
that must be introduced into a population for change to take place: mutation
and genetic recombination. Mutations are random nucleotide alterations such as
copying errors or changes induced by external mutagens. In contrast, genetic
recombination is performed by the cell during the preparation of gametes
(sperm, egg, pollen) which are used for sexual reproduction.
The genomic differences between any two siblings are
tremendous, and with rare exception all of those genetic distinctions were
specifically created recombination. Both recombination and mutations can
contribute to the evolution of an organism, but genetic recombination is the
primary source of the genetic distinctions between individuals in a population,
and must therefore be the principal driving force behind evolution
While one holds upon expansion, Creation descends from
inception, i.e. point of origin. (LIFE) however complex these theories are,
both cannot find an actual point of origin of life.
For this purpose they both inherit the same standards by
canceling each other theories as speculation. While one can be answered physically
under man made proven hypothesizes the other can be proven by simple physical archeology.
The inference that evolutionist writers conspire to suggest
that a millennial amount of generational people somehow conspired to develop or
orchestrated the ultimate lie of transition, would be in itself ludicrous.
