Just finished watching a PEOPLE'S COURT case which involved a female JW landlord, who was suing a former tenant (also female) for breaching an apartment lease by moving out prior to the exiration of the lease, damage to the apt, etc. The JW won the case.
The ex-tenant attempted to defend the breach by relating that the JW landlord must have been repeatedly illegally entering her apartment when the tenant wasn't home, since she had been told by other tenants that the landlord had made comments (gossiped) about the tenant's furniture, lifestyle, etc.
BIGGIE!!! Tenant related one specific instance that JW Landlord "admitted to" entering her apt when she was not there.
After 9/11/01, Tenant had placed an American flag in her apt window. JW Landlord admitted entering the apt and taking down the flag.
Judge Milian proceeded to lecture the Landlord on the illegal entry, as well as intruding on the tenant's patriotic rights. JW acknowledged the wrong and apologized for such, but indicated that she did so because she did not want to take sides and that the flag in the window was making a statement for every person living in the building, including the Landord. (paraphrasing) The Judge's comeback made her clarify that she was "against terrorism", but not against peoples of other countries. (Wish I had taped this.)
When ruling, Judge Milian chewed the JW out a second time, and even asked if she (JW) wanted to take down the courtroom's flag.
Although I was convinced the Landlord was a JW, nothing had been said about JWs, Bible, etc. up to this point.
However, during the post-trial interview, the issue was raised again, and this time JW stated that she was just trying to remain neutral (my only recollection of the use of the word) "according to the Scriptures."
I just wish someone on the program would have mentioned that this flag desecrating "busybody" was a typical JW.