by Francois 10 Replies latest jw friends
...like they are. You know, like dicks. The reason is that projectiles shaped like pussies don't fly very far and certainly don't go ballistic. Unless of course they're attached to the rest of the device.
NOW. Can we leave off with the penis metaphors? It's stupid. And it's a cooincidence at best. Frickin' psychobabble.
Francois
What's wrong with projectiles shaped like a phallic symbol? Or did I miss something......
Love your new picture, Beck.
mmmmm penis...
Oh are you all still here?
Hi Dutchie...am having lots of pic trouble today...still working on it...I thought maybe I need a better camera but alas...I need a better face...can I borrow yours LOL.
Miss Joannadandy...you're gonna get us all in trouble for saying that word on Francois' thread He won't like us honouring his dangly bits on here.
Beck
Francois, as the bible says, there's nothing new under the sun. Penises were created first, THEN projectiles... and as Beck said, what's your problem with projectiles.... and penises... oops, I said that word again....
Beck - nice new pic.
Edited by - Prisca on 3 July 2002 4:5:45
pussies dont go ballistic unless theyre attached to the rest of the equipment huh?
So does that mean projectiles go ballistic disattached? or do they have to be attached too?
We need the opinion of an expert here... pris?
Nothing wrong with the face Beck.
God, I love this group.
What I'm refering to is the hoary old metaphors used by the anti-gun nut crowd having to do with projectiles of all kinds being shaped like penises and serving double-duty as some sort of psychological symbol of male dominance, etc., etc., etc.,
I'm saying the shape is coincidental and has no such psychological meaning. It's old; it's tired; it's inane, it's meaningless.
Beck, I like your new picture too. Perhaps I'll drag out a picture and use it instead of that galaxy one.
Francois
Now how were we supposed to know that's what you meant?
Edited by - Mackin on 3 July 2002 6:40:47
