In her book “The Surrendered Wife”, California housewife Laura Doyle advises married women to submit to their husbands in all circumstances. She says that the man should take absolute control in every imaginable situation, and that the woman should be passive, always giving way to her husband. She should give her husband all of her salary, and if she gets a little bit back to spend, well, she should be very grateful to her lord and master for his kindness.
Over on H20, pro-witness poster Flair claims that women need discipline just like children do. He advocates spanking as a means of keeping wives under control. This is in addition to the WTBTS dictates re women being submissive to the husband, otherwise known as “The Head Of The House”.
My question is this: If you are a male, is this sort of relationship, where the female is submissive to you, preferable to a relationship where both partners regard themselves as individuals with equal rights? Now for the girls, do you prefer to be in a relationship where the male always takes the lead? Or is it possible that marriage requires a degree of provocation to give it some spice?
Just for the record, I`m trying to figure out just how appropriate the witness way of marriage is in 2001.
Englishman.