Nevada Votes on Marijuana Proposal

by gilwarrior 14 Replies latest social current

  • gilwarrior
    gilwarrior

    PETITIONS PASS MUSTER: Marijuana proposal to be on ballot

    Measure would allow adults to possess small amounts of substance By ED VOGEL
    REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU

    CARSON CITY -- Nevada voters will be asked in November whether adults should be allowed to possess small amounts of marijuana, the secretary of state's office announced Tuesday.

    Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement turned in 74,740 valid signatures on petitions to change the state's marijuana laws, Deputy Secretary of State Susan Bilyeu said. The organization, an offshoot of the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project, needed at least 61,336 valid signatures to place the question on the Nov. 5 general election ballot.

    The proposal to allow adults to possess as much as three ounces of marijuana without police interference needs approval in the November election and again in 2004 to become part of the Nevada Constitution.

    "The success of our petition provides solid evidence that most Nevadans think it is a waste of their tax dollars to arrest people with small amounts of marijuana," said Billy Rogers, a spokesman for Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement.

    "Nevadans support this initiative because it allows law enforcement the resources to track down terrorists, murderers, rapists and other violent criminals."

    FBI records show the number of people arrested on marijuana charges nationally reached nearly 750,000 in 2000, up from fewer than 300,000 in 1991.

    Until last year, Nevada had the strictest marijuana law in the nation. People possessing any amount of marijuana could be charged with a felony, although most received lesser charges in exchange for attending drug treatment programs. Possession of one ounce or less of marijuana in Nevada is now a misdemeanor, punishable by a $600 fine.

    Under the Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement proposal, adults would not be arrested if they possessed three ounces or less of marijuana. They still could not use the drug in public places or while driving.

    The petition also calls for the state to set up a distribution plan to provide medical marijuana to qualified patients.

    Currently, 185 people in Nevada have permission to use marijuana for medical reasons. They must grow their own marijuana. How they acquire seeds is left up to the qualified users.

    Besides meeting the total signature requirement, Bilyeu said Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement met a second requirement by collecting a sufficient number of signatures in 14 of the state's 17 counties, falling short only in Douglas, Elko and Nye counties. Under state law, sufficient signatures had to be collected in at least 13 counties.

    While permitting adults to use small amounts of marijuana, Rogers said this proposal recognizes the need to prevent irresponsible use of marijuana by minors and drivers.

    "Today, responsible and other law-abiding citizens face arrest and imprisonment for possessing small amounts of marijuana," he said.

    "This initiative will protect responsible people and punish those who use irresponsibly."

  • SpiceItUp
    SpiceItUp

    *mental note to self...if it passes move to Nevada*

    "Nevadans support this initiative because it allows law enforcement the resources to track down terrorists, murderers, rapists and other violent criminals."

    bout time somebody realized that!!!

    Spice

  • LB
    LB

    Well Gil it looks like soon you'll legally be able to smoke a dubbie while boinking a legal hooker.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Good news (new light, heh heh). But, will the federal govt respect it, if it passes? Will the feds disrespect it like they did the medical use law in california?

    SS

  • peaceloveharmony
    peaceloveharmony

    woo! good news, hope other states start to follow suit.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    LB

    The righteous new system/paradise/heavenly kingdom approacheth.

    SS

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    I think the crucial part of the Nevada law is the fact the govt will sell and tax it. If the govt sells it at a lower price than the dealers, then the dealers (and all of the violence associated with the greed) will go away. If they would just legalise drugs and sell them+ tax them like alcohol+tobacco (legal drugs!) then all of the gang and drug violence would end. Think about it. Columbia is in the middle of a civil war funded by our desire for drugs. If we legalised drugs and sold them for 10% of their current cost all of the Cartels would go bust! Gang members would have to *gasp* get jobs! I voted for the Calfifornia prop, it was not as good as the Nevada prop, but it was a start. I just hope the Feds get there heads out of their asses. Does anyone here have a figure on how much money was spent on the DEA and the 'WAR' on drugs last year??? Im sure it was in the tens of billions. They could take that money and fund EVERYONES education. The problem is all those federal jackasses dont want to lose their jobs so they justify 'the war'. Shit, transfer the DEA agents over to the FBI or the Border Patrol. I would rather have them stoping some terrorist idiot instead of wasting my tax dollars tracking down some pot head.

    When we had prohibition A) It didnt work and B) Crooks made millions and crime skyrocketed (mob anyone???)

    Sooo we woke up and relegalized alcohol, but I guess the feds didnt learn from past mistakes. OH LETS BAN DRUGS!! A) It doesnt work and B) Crooks are making BILLIONS and crime has skyrocketed (gangs anyone????)

    What cracks me up is the arguement 'if we legalise it, then everyone will do it.....' This is false. In countries or states that have/had legal drugs, consumption did not increase. Amsterdam is a perfect example. Soft drugs have been legal there for over 10 years and consumption has not increased. In fact, when I went there, the majority of the people smoking where from England!! What is comes down to is A) politicians do not want to admit they are wrong B) Big money and jobs are tied into the DEA (transfer them!) and C) Drug Dealers have lots of $$$$$ to make sure it stays illegal (campain contributions anyone??)

    If anyone thinks that drugs should stay illegal I would like to refer you to someone who wholeheartedly agree's with you- The Columbian Cartels!!! (and every single drug dealer/gangmember/ drugsmugler/ and lets not forget the mob!) They shit their pants when people talk of legalisation!

    I would gestimate that during the past 30 years, the US. Govt has spent over $100 Billion fighting the 'War'

    That is just straight anti-drug funding-lets not count the costs of Prison/Trial/Lost Wages/Social Impact of all the people in Prison on drug charges (aprox 40%)

    Fools Hate Knowledge

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Crazy

    Exactly. I would add a small point. That is the cia's involvement in importing coke from south america. Cia has all the means to do it efficiently. With the money it makes, it can fund it's own worldwide operations, free from congressional oversite/knowledge. That cia was doing this under reagan and elder nush is very well documented. It's not conspiracy theory. This means of course, that cia would be against legalisation/plummeting prices, as you said.

    SS

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    Hmmm Yes, I remember when that article came out in the San Jose Mercury. It wouldnt surprise me. As much as I love my country, there are times when we do some shady things. If you can think slightly out of the box- the CIA brings in the drugs and gets their cut, the GOVT spends $$$$ fighting it and keeps the DEA employed! Well I dont know how exact this may be, and Im not even propossing that its true, but I sure at one time or another the GOVT has been in bed with the Cartel (when it suited their needs).

    I remember a 60minutes story a couple of years ago about the DEA and its witness deals. Aparently they let this guy [Guy A] smuggle in tons and tons of coke because he was helping the DEA find some other dealer [ Guy B] who had made the DEA look bad. Basicly the dealer [Guy B] outwitted the DEA on a couple of occasions and they were willing to do anything to get the guy. At one point Guy A gets pulled over in texas driving a pickup with a TON of coke in the back! He gets busted by the Texas State Police--but an hour later the DEA sets him free!!!!!!!!! So anyways, the dude [Guy A] eventually goes to jail a couple years later after the DEA gets tired of him---After he smuggles in a couple of Billion dollars of coke!! F$@% the DEA!

  • SYN
    SYN

    Well if THAT law is approved, I can just see half of the US suddenly moving to Nevada! They'll have to rename it to "Little Amsterdam"

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit