i went back and looked through the thread....the only person that i could find that said anything about "wall street..going to war with itself", was in fact you.
I was merely mocking those who implied that that is what I meant.
as ive stated many times, my exposing of you serves a purpose, and it has very little to do with whether or not i care personally about your wager, or any of your other viewpoints. spending "untold hours" refuting your nonsense does not mean that i take a personal interest in it
So far you haven't refuted anything. If you imagine otherwise I think that goes back to the delusional thing.
guess i assumed that by calling bin laden a myth, he was implying bin laden didnt have anything to do with 9-11, silly me. also, i love how he shouts at the top of his lungs "not a single bit of evidence, was ever presented, publicly!"....lol, watch the video weve all seen larouche, and calm down.
Silly you indeed. There are lots of people who don't buy into the myth that some guy holed up in a cave in Afganistan is the mastermind of terrorism. What do you mean that he was "shouting at the top of his lungs"? You are silly.
so in one breath you say it is public knowledge, this government book cooking, and the next breath you admit it is not........sometimes i wonder if you simply underestimate every reader out there, and think that no one will catch you in these constant lies and contradictions.
No. Some things are public knowledge and other things are yet to be revealed. What's so mysterious about that?
the revisions, yes...and theyve always been public, hardly fakery. again, why no mention of these revisions until now? why werent you screaming about book cooking in 1992 when the gdp was revised downward?
For the same reason that I am not screaming about it now, you goofball. LOL