Obviously, the JW leaders felt the need to refocus attention on the article because they perceive JWs have gotten lax with respect to shunning. Therefore, I think it is quite logical to expect our JW relatives to exhibit more "appropriate," stricter behavior with their DA'd, DF'd (or any variety thereof) relatives. Even though nothing has technically changed, the
WTS evidently felt people's individual behavior toward their non-active, etc., relatives was remiss.
I'm glad to have found out this increased emphasis on how to treat non-active/DF/DA JWs: otherwise I'd have no exposure to it. Personally, based on my mother and sister's behavior toward me of late, I think they've definately taken the shunning emphasis to heart. I figured something was up, and I had already mentioned this to dh.
All I can say, is too bad for them. They made their bed: they'll lie in it. I'm simply not going to put up with their controlling behavior: I put up with it for 20+ years as a JW. Now that I'm out and free, I want them to know that I have absolutely no respect for their manipulative behavior. I don't need a relationship with them so badly that I sacrifice my dignity, self-respect, and that of my family. Their behavior of late is affecting their ability to see their grandchildren/nephews/neices who are infants. They'll have to live with THEIR decisions in this area.
I agree. I think too many people give their WBTS family WAAY too much control, even still.