Comments on Connie Chung / CNN

by Amazing 59 Replies latest jw friends

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    That's right! This is a free speech zone: You're a Dumb Butt!!!

  • comforter
    comforter

    elsewhere

    i will not stoop to your level. rather than face facts or show tolerance of different opinions, you resort to ad hominum argument. so sad.

    christian charity

    comfy

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    Well comfortable please explain the 1997 WT using what is in the magazine article. What is written is pretty simple.

    So clearly tell me where in that magazine holds the magic words that you say it does?

    hawk

  • sisteract
    sisteract

    I DIDN'T ASK IF YOU ARE A MOLESTER--WHY ARE YOU VOLUNTEERING SUCH INCRIMINATING INFO?

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    [Moons Comforter]

    Like what ya see, Dumb Butt????

  • comforter
    comforter

    the 97 wt say if molestor repentant, he is to be helped with his weakness. it said nothing about protecting pedophiles.

    sister act

    you ask if comfy like one of weak brothers mentioned. weak brother talk about is molestor. comfy will always disavow any action like that.

    comfy

  • comforter
    comforter

    else

    comforter not gay or molestor. he never like sight of man rear. but you sterling example of a loving debater. love the spirit you show.

    LOL

    comfy

  • CC Ryder
    CC Ryder

    I tell you what, Bill is one sharp Cat! His presentation of such hard information was very well done. Those two young women were very well spoken and determined to represent only two out of hundreds and hundreds of others who are in the same situation. This can only help in a big way to expose the practices of the WTS and help force them to back off with such calous, harsh treatment of innocent victims while condoning those who offend innocence.

    Thanks to Connie Chung and CNN for helping to expose the WTS.

    CC

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    That is the point comforter - it SAYS NOTHING!!!!!

    It talks about 2 witnesses must see the crime and thus you know like I that a sicko usually doesn't have a witness.

    Thus, the sicko must confess.

    Back in 1997, Witnesses were forbidden from going to the police as per the NOv 15/1973 QFR (page 703) WT magazine. This was actually against the law in all 50 states. Elders would only go to the police in states that had the laws. In some cases they didn't go to the police when they should have (eg. Berry case).

    Thus, if the sicko said he didn't do the crime, the WTS ensured he didn't do the time.

    And if the sicko does admit it and is reinstated like in the Pandelo case the sicko gets to knock on my f___ing door!!!!

    You lying bastard Comfortable - get off this board Comfortable!!!!

    hawk

  • sisteract
    sisteract

    Oh Comfy, who is to help you with your weakness another young victim ??

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit