What did Bleep Say?

by ISP 22 Replies latest jw friends

  • Sunspot
    Sunspot

    Cass said; "I saw Bleeps post prior to the editing and I found it tastless, because it contained "triggers"

    "I do not know if you are an abuse survivor/victim or not. Words written, a picture, a scent all these may be considered a "trigger." Triggers bring back the pain of the actual abuse as it was happening all over again. "

    Cass......Thanks for posting thos thought. Many AREN'T aware of "triggers", and I would have never thought to post it as you did.

    Well said....GREAT post.

    Hugs,

    Annie

  • teejay
    teejay

    Thanks for sending the original post, (you know who you are).

    The following opinion you all may file in the "for what it's worth" bin...

    As I said to my friend in email, Bleep's post was definitely in [u]extremely[/b] poor taste. Worthy of deletion? Iiiiiiiii-dunno. A tough call. For a sarcastic observation/commentary about Bill's efforts (and the entire silentlambs agenda) it was OUT THERE... a stretch, to say the least.

    I know there are former abuse victims that lurk/post here. Offending them (or anyone) shouldn't be one of the goals of posting, but that goal should be balanced with a need for people to extend to others the right to express themselves.

    Now, I don't know Bleep. WAIT A MINUTE!!... that didn't come out right!

    What I mean is, I don't know the poster that posts as Bleep. *whew!* He's a watchtower apologist on the level of You Know, right? Then one simply must take whatever Bleep says with a grain of salt.

    'Course, deleting his post works, too. All I know is that if it had been me and I was a mod, I wouldn't have done anything. Maybe it's a good thing that I'm not a mod, eh?

    ===========

    >> What Bleep wrote was descriptive pornography meant to shock and insult.

    Alchemist,

    I'm glad I read it myself since now I can say that my viewpoint is different from yours. I saw descriptive wording but nothing I'd liken to pornography.

    And maybe I'm giving him a little too much credit (since I don't normally read Bleep ), but I don't think his intent was to shock or insult. I think he was making a statement about Bill and the fact that Bill has been on TV so much lately. I could be wrong, tho.

  • StinkyPantz
    StinkyPantz

    Teejay-

    Bleep's post was definitely meant to shock. I too read the original post and it was horrifying. I couldn't believe it. Sometimes people go too far.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit