tj-
Thank you, Dub.Some of us saw this in JanH over a year ago but didn't articulate it as well as you did here.
hey, no problem....i assumed i wasnt the only one who has noticed his infantile tactics. oh, and speaking of infantile, i now have another characteristic to add to the list of yk/jan similarities......the infamous ignore when you run out of rebuttals. to my dismay, i recieved a plonk from jan yesterday......you can imagine how heartbroken i was. i was even more disturbed when i recieved an email from him explaining what the plonk meant (that i am "hereby ignored"), and that i should "save myself the effort of writing back".........oh the agony. (actually i did know what the plonk meant, as ive witnessed him pulling that stunt and running out of past arguments with others). its sad really.....i will genuinely miss these rational discussions with jan......they are always so constructive (like beating your head against a brick wall is constructive)......yes they will be missed.
aa
(ps.....i forgot to add that yk sometimes uses the ingore function simply because he doesnt want to engage in a discussion with someone who continually uses an excessive amount of profanity, which is understandable.)