Hello,
As some of you may know, I am engaged in research regarding the history of Church Discipline.It comes of course as no great surprise to learn that the WTS seldom has an exclusive right to any of its own doctrines despite its attempt at painting itself as the champion of prime Truth and integrity.
I chanced upon a statement made in a book dealing with Methodist discipline and published in 1884 that focuses on the charge of apostasy and its outcome :
"#235 - If a Member of our Church shall be accused of endeavoring to sow dissension in any of our Societies, by inveighing against either our Doctrines or Discipline, the person so offending shall first be reproved by the Preacher in charge; if he persist in such pernicious practice he shall be bought to trail, tried by three discreet members of the Church, and if found guilty should be expelled".
Of course Members could appeal their expulsion :
"#253 - In all cases of trail and conviction under the provisions of #214-222, an Appeal shall be allowed to a Judicial Conference, constituted as hereinafter provided, if the condemned person signify his intention to appeal at the time of his conviction, or at any time thereafter when he is informed thereof..this done the parties shall withdraw, and the Judicial Conference shall then decide the case."
Once sentence has been passed and the Member is expelled his punishment was:
"#256 - After a Preacher shall have been regularly tried and expelled he shall have no privileges of Society ( communication ) or Sacraments in our Church without confession, contrition and humiliation, and satisfactory reformation. italics mine
The Methodist's seem to have been one of the few religions that grew out of the mid C18th revival who practiced a communicative shunning, as opposed to a more natural exlusion of fellowship.
More later - HS