Seeing how you pulled my comments out of context, I felt the need to reply.
You miserable, big booger
was a reply to Outlaw calling me a miserable, little snot. The context you left out was that I had an argument (or my own opinion which you, for some unknown reason, don't think I have) to go along with it, as well as the rest of your weak examples, which are an attempt to turn the attention away from the fact that you have resorted to having no argument, but rather just using insults to prove your point.
If you go back and read the entire thread, you will see that people like Quotes and myself were able to discuss and disagree on this topic without resorting to insults or taking things personally.
On the other hand, Disengaged decided to address me in a reply and simply tell me I had no idea what I was talking about without an argument of his own. YOU then decided to side with him and in your first address to me tell me that I am "Applying double standards as usual????"
I replied to you without insult asking for proof of double standards.
During this, Disengaged continues to have absolutely no ability to articulate an argument beyond simply insulting me and using general illustrations.
Then, as usual, OUTLAW jumps in calling me a miserable little snot and attacking me without even addressing the topic of the thread.
Dia, as well, decides to simply say I am in denial (who knows about what) and, like the rest, provide no argument.
Then you decide to buddy up with Dia and tell me "Try to think for yourself once, then you might find out!!!"
Don't expect to bully up with your buddies on here and win an argument by throwing empty insults. I do not walk away from insults, mob mentality (cult whateveryouwanttocallit) or any form of intimidation. I have clearly stated my argument throughout this thread and have only returned insults to those who have hurled them at me.
Shall we continue your pointless debate?
