OK, I've had a few beers, so I wouldn't normally post anything in case I regretted it later. Not so easy to delete things these days.
However this one seems safe enough, so here goes. TB has drawn a distinction between who is deemed OK to have weapons of mass destruction, and who is not. The OK's include UK, US, OZ because they are democracies, and China. The border liners are India and Pakistan, the OK criteria comes from the knowledge that their weapons are most likely only ever going to be used against each other anyway, so, for the rest of the world, it's no big deal.
Saddam is a no-no. Saddam has used chemical weapons aginst his own people, the Kurds. He has launched missiles at Israel too. He has publicly stated that he wants to annihilate Jews and Persians (Iranians).
Delivery. He couldn't launch anything at the US at present. London is a lot closer, he could do damage possibly by the fourth protocol technique ( a DIY bomb assembled in the country to be targetted).
I'm convinced, send in the SAS!
Englishman.