email: naive JW sister, YOUR SUGGESTIONS? (page 2)

JeffT

Although all manner of funny replies might come to mind, I agree lying to this person is a bad idea. Frankly she sounds like the kind of person that meets a "nice guy" in a chat room, packs her bag, gets on a bus to meet him, and is never seen again.

teenyuck

well we all know that jehovah
will reconize there goods deeds and they will be rezorected, please write me
back and let me know what is happening there, PLEASE!!! thank you very much
for everthing

LOL....all I can do is shake my head at the American school system. She has been a dub since she was 3.5 yrs old and cannot spell "RESURRECTED?!" She will never make it to paradise!

VeniceIT

HHAHAHA she spells foneticly, I love it

Mom studied with two young girls and they laughed at diff things they noticed in the hall.

JW Pronounceation.....

Carengation as in 'So what Carengation are you in?"

Acrit as in 'Taking in Acrit Knowledge' (it was noticed that if not used in a JW setting they did pronounce it Accurate, but as soon as the word 'Knoweledge' joins it, they lose the U sound.)

And how many different ways can you say 'Auxiliary', 'Auxillery' or as our school overseer would say 'Aaaaxillllliary Pioneering'

Ven

wednesday

on the serious side.-and the not so serious

I think u shoud tell her who u are and what the site is for. You will neve get someone away for JW by being sneaky with them . After all that is what JW are told apostate's are-sneaky and vile.

Serioulsy consider if she had half a brain and could find this site.

Also, "we just love it when our 18 year old JW sisters come to visit" Well, i guess 18 is legal

wednesday

"Truly the scriputres from Song of Solomon come to mind"-u are going to have her thinking th WT are child molesters-i can;'t beleive u sent that back to her. lol but for real-she is a child!!

Quotes

Thanks for all the input everybody!

As for the comment about "18 year old sisters" and "Song of Solomen" -- that was my first and only reply, way way back in August 2001, long before WT molesters were on my personal radar screen. If sending it now, I would not be so careless. What I had intended was simply the normal, longings of *randy* young Bethelites when some pretty young (but having attained the "age of majority) door-knocker comes for a visit from Asswipe, Middle-of-NoWhere. I got a kick out of her reply, where she said she would "keep those scriptures in mind" -- come on, if she had ever read what Dr. Ruth calls "the most erotic love poem ever written" she would have been clued that something was up. The fact that she took it all in stride tells me either (A) she had never read it or (B) now I know how easy it is for the Mormons and David Koresh's of the world to convince young girls to do something because it is "in the bible".

I will craft a reply and post it here; give me some time to mull it over.

~Quotes

ballistic

Quotes, I know you're only having a laugh and I like your sense of humor, but I bet she would be horrified if she logged on here and saw all her letters on display.

Pathofthorns

Dude that was priceless... The WT must hate u for scouping their precious URL's.. lol

Path

Bendrr

Keep on emailing like you've done already. Work in a plug for the Ray Franz books for sure.

Yeah, lie. If you want to call it lying. I call it Anti-Theocratic Warfare. The Evil Empire lies to gain new recruits, lies to them once they're members, and lies to everyone else for that matter. All you're doing is answering emails from some teenage dub chick who's about as sharp as a bowling ball. At worst, she'll figure out you're not really the Watchtower Society. But not likely. Presented with the "requirement" to read two books (which will make her look like the smartest girl in the trailer park) in order to even be considered to go to Bethel, she'll doubtlessly buy and read both books cover to cover more than once. At that point your job is done. You'll either hear back from her or you won't. If you don't then don't worry about it, at least you tried. If you do then probably it will be an angry letter of disassociation in which case you won that battle and saved her life and can then let her in on it or whatever you want.

Do it!

Col. Bendrr, [classified]

Edited by - bendrr on 19 September 2002 19:43:4

Quotes

ballistic, that had occurred to me, but I decided there was very little chance that this door-knocker would ever visit here. Also, I removed here name so anonymity if protected. Sure, she might recognize her own writing, but she will be the only one that knows she is really [name deleted].

I think US law refers to "expectation of privacy" with regards to communication, wire-tapping, etc. I also understand that since TCP/IP is a packet based shared medium protocol, and therefore any intermediary can see and reassemble the (non encrypted) packets containing this email message, there is the same "expectation of privacy" that some would have shouting a conversation in a large, crowded room -- ie, none. So I'm not too worried.

OK, I've way over-analyzed this. Time to get back to thinking about a letter response. What to do, what to do.

email: naive JW sister, YOUR SUGGESTIONS?

Share this