Very good thread Viv and this one gets me thinking - and the comments have been good too.
I think that for me, friendships exist with others to varying degrees - some are 'close' friends, some are 'good' friends (the two may be synonymous) then there are people I consider to be friends, but that I really don't do much with socially - yet I still veiw them as friends. And as Karen said, there are 'acquaintances' that we all have, and of course, the degree of closeness needed to make them a friend is just not quite there but there can be potential for a friendship in some cases, though often such people simply remain acquaintances for whatever reason.
I have some very good 'online' friendships too. Is an online friend a friend of a different sort? Is the word "online" implying some sort of limit on the degree or extent of the friendship? I've thought about this a lot, and I don't really know the answer, but I have some people that I consider true friends that I have only met online, and I have spoken by phone with a couple of them and that helps solidify the friendship too. They've helped me a lot and have been there for me and I try to be there for them in whatever way I can. I've had a couple of such friendships that have lasted almost three years now, and are still growing and going strong. To me, they are true friendships, limited only by the distance between us physically. I have some newer online friendships too that have been very rewarding and enjoyable.
Sometimes we create (perhaps out of some necessity) certain friendship categories, i.e, school friends, work friends, jw friends, online friends, etc. But to me, ultimately, a friend is a person who is trusting, caring, loyal, fun, and forgiving, among many other things.
Edited by - jack2 on 27 September 2002 9:33:0