Sorry but your theory is a little weak. Many things do not have barcodes, for instance fruits and vegtables. Also Cars and the such. Barcodes are for inventory and pricing efficency. The price of goods are lower thanks to barcodes. How would you suggest supermarket clerks ring up your groceries??? Barcodes make shopping faster and help suppliers maintain inventory and such.
Yes.... But when the mark of the beast wiil be implanted will not is possible to buy and to sell without have his mark on the hand or forehead.
Barcode will be only a mode for know the Price that will be indisputable. And by means of it, his possessors will be known for the financial transaction, but only for their.
If your are trying to say that barcodes stuck on People could be the mark, well then I might be able to see that. But the barcode by itself has nothing to do with it. Its what you do with the barcode that could be a problem. Even then, it could be something totally different than a barcode. A barcode is unable to store any information and is nothing more than a scanable reference # for the purchasing system. An implanted chip would be much more feasable. Personally, I dont feel the Gov or anyone else needs to know what Im doing with my money so they could stick a chip up their ass for all I care.
