And these are just cases that were reported.
Of course there must be thousands of cases that were not reported to the elders.
But what about even those that were reported to the elders?
There are 1006 cases that the Australia branch knows about & has records on.
Current instructions are to "call the branch immediately" upon even an allegation of abuse, but that was not the policy until some time in the 90's.
What about all the cases prior to then that were reported to elders, but the judicial committee determined that the accused was "truly repentant"?
In such a case, the accused would get a mere "private reproof". No record of anything whatsoever would have been reported to the branch.
In my experience, for every case ending in disfellowshipping, there are at least 3 or 4 that end in "reproof" only.
1950's, 1960's, 1970's, 1980's, 1990's.......how many thousands of other child abuse cases were met with "reproof only" and the branch had (has) absolutely no friggin' idea?