another thing is that the lawyer is judging what happened in 1988-89 by present day standards re child abuse. So if the elders want to come across as credible they need to focus on what little info re child abuse was available in Australia then.
there is much more they can do to maintain a modicum of self respect.
GAWD - this is coming across to be as if it was happening in the late nineteenth-early 20th century rather than in the 21 century and as intellectual bullying. After all the elders are not highly educated men - they are often manual workers having given up school at 16-18. The lawyers have years of training and there is nothing on their part that indicates they are at least giving some consideration to putting those they are questioning at ease. What is the point of doing what they accuse the elders of doing to victims. It is a horrible disquieting circus from a first world nation.
If this was a court case there would be fair representation for the accused so that someone representing the elder would raise an objection to the style of questioning and would perhaps set the record straight re any points that the elder may have forgotten in his confusion....