Some subjects seem to re-appear almost on a daily basis. Noticeable by it's absense has been the subject of AIDS. I think possibly this doesn't get discussed here becuase it is one of the few hot topics which goes in favour of the witnesses. They claim that their stand on promiscuity, homosexuality, drug taking and blood transfusions makes them practically 'immune' to the disease. If this is the case, I can understand it not being a prevelant topic here.
I personally don't mind being completely honest about where the witnesses get it right. There is good in all organisations, and sometimes somthing good can come from suprising places. However does the end justify the means in this case? That is a question. As you may know, the blood issue has affected my family and I am strongly opposed to it. But this is one of the reasons they quote as why they have a low AIDS membership.
By the way, if you are wondering how I got onto this subject, I was reading up on it while researching population statistics for a post yesterday and was horrified to find that 1 person in 4 in some countires now have HIV / AIDS. I was completely shocked.