I am struck with how frequent and bold UFO incidents are becoming:
www.rense.com/general32/filers112802.htm
www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_718085.html
I am also greatly impressed with the recent vindication of the Atkins Diet in a
major study - and what it tells us about the state of human knowledge and science.
What stuns me is that this diet has been explicitly described and debated for
about 30 years - and yet, its proof took decades - with some 'experts' STILL refusing
to believe it is effective without causing heart trouble.
Of all things to be investigated, I don't think you can get more verifiable than
the effects of a diet - you get some people, put them on the diet, measure the blood
chemistry, and publish the effects.
And yet, the 30 years remains!
What should we expect about less empirically verifiable matters - like ESP,
UFOs, various theories of evolution, the 'big bang' - and other questions that
depend on much more subtle evidence?
I understand that the Wright Brothers flights were denounced as a hoax by newspapers
and 'experts' - EVEN WHILE ANYONE COULD WATCH THESE FLIGHTS TAKE PLACE!
I guess people have to adjust to new realities by 'getting used' to them. They enter
the human field of belief from the edges gradually - no matter how verified they may
be!
And I have little doubt what would happen if First Contact ever does take place:
The Watchtower will denounce it as 'demons' - and warn Witnesses not to read about it!
I can actually imagine them stubbornly holding on and denying everything in a final
(and futile) attempt at CONTROL! It would truly be something to watch!
and one day, who knows
the work of Copernicus may be finished
and we will be 'dethroned' from thinking that earth
is the figurative center of the universe
and all revealed religion fades away.
metatron ( I'll bet you didn't think I could relate the Atkins Diet to UFOs
did you?)