Watchtower Society Given Prestigious Medical Award

by Derrick 31 Replies latest social current

  • Eric
    Eric

    Rick,

    I wonder if the WT knows that the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management, the donors of this really neat-o award, were the co-sponsor of a surgical symposium called Trauma Day 2002? And that the host of Trauma Day 2002 was the Department of Surgery of the Uniformed Services University? That the USU, in their mission statement, declare loyalty to the U.S. Department of Defense? That the USU view themselves as aiding the United Nations under the New World Order?

    A very interesting can of associatively related worms to open if the WT is aware of it.

    Another assholian blunder for touting this award on their own website if they are not.

    Eric

    Edited by - Eric on 30 November 2002 9:58:36

  • Joyzabel
    Joyzabel

    Derrick, do you think this award is going to give a warm and fuzzy feeling to any mother or father out there that has lost a child to the "blood issue"? Or a son or daughter who has lost a mother or father to the "blood issue"? Any lost life is not worth a silly award. Get real.

    Edited by - joy2bfree on 30 November 2002 12:2:53

  • SloBoy
    SloBoy

    Derrick,

    Ah yes, those prestigious awards. Makes me think about that "prestigious award" given by Time Magazine for their "Man of the Year" award back in the 1930's. Unfortunately, most people were sadly duped as to what sort of person Adolf Hitler really was.

  • sf
    sf

    Trauma Day 2002 (scroll to bottom of page):

    http://www.sabm.org/

  • sf
    sf

    Trauma Day 2002 - SABM co-sponsored Trauma Day 2002 on August 22-23rd, 2002. Hosted by the Department of Surgery of USU, SABM provided presentations by Dr.'s Shander, Spence and Wright. Right-click here to download the program brochure.

  • Reborn2002
    Reborn2002

    Sloboy said:

    Ah yes, those prestigious awards. Makes me think about that "prestigious award" given by Time Magazine for their "Man of the Year" award back in the 1930's. Unfortunately, most people were sadly duped as to what sort of person Adolf Hitler really was.

    Ah yes. prestigious awards. As you pointed out, Hitler was Time Magazine's Man of the Year for 1938.. and Joseph Stalin won the same award in 1942.

    The original article from Time Magazine for Hitler in 1938:

    http://www.time.com/time/special/moy/1938.html

    and for Stalin in 1942:

    http://www.time.com/time/special/moy/1942.html

    Hell, OJ won the prestigious Heisman Trophy but that made him no less a murderer..

    Edited by - Reborn2002 on 30 November 2002 15:5:1

  • AMNESIAN
    AMNESIAN

    Surely the WTS could have made the same meaningful contributions to medical science's blood management advancements and merited for itself the same award while, at the same time, rightly leaving it to individual Christian consciences the matter of each one's own personal healthcare and blood management choices.

    By no reckoning does one preclude the other and it is for this gross abuse of the spiritual authority they arrogate to themselves that they stand bloodguilty before God. The award of a Nobel prize could not mitigate such harm.

    AMNESIAN

    Edited by - AMNESIAN on 30 November 2002 15:13:38

  • waiting
    waiting

    Speaking of medical research, knowledge gleaned from it, and ethics:

    During WWII, the Nazis used many doctors (not all German, btw) to do medical research on their prisoners....by the thousands.

    Do you know why the medical profession knows exactly how long a person could stay in cold water before dying? Because the Nazi doctors did tests and found out exactly how long it took to die. Now........the medical professional had that information, but since it was gleaned at the expense of innocent persons being tortured to death....is it ethical to use such information?

    Smarter persons than I have wrestled that question of ethics. But one thing for sure.....I sure as hell don't believe the Nazi doctors deserve a medal for discovering these medical facts while torturing people to death.

    The Nazi doctors were so impressed with their medical experiments, they recorded them on camera. I remember seeing the one where a boy around 12 was systematically hit in the head with a rifle butt to see how long it would take from him to pass out. After reviving him, then how long before permanent brain damage set in. Then how long before permanent physical damage was sustained.

    Of course, they needed more than one boy for this.....as they kept permanently damaging the boys in the name of medical science. And, of course, some of these boys died of their injuries....but it was carefully documented.

    Rather like the WTBTS. Of course these men, women & children died needlessly. But look what we've learned!

    waiting

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex
    Don't you agree that it's fair to give them credit when due?

    Even a blind squirrel can find an acorn once in a while.

  • Xander
    Xander

    Waiting's answer captures my feelings on the matter.

    Your post implies that we need to consider the benefits of the WTBTS's policies, regardless of their cost.

    Identical to saying we should just thank the Nazis for their research, and just remember the 'useful' information they brought the world instead of their evils.

    Obviously, this is mistaken. There is a line towards evil that, once crossed, invalidates ANYTHING else done by the party in question.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit