So I just watched the excerpts about G. Jackson, this one starting at 46:00
&feature=youtu.be&t=46m12s
They read a letter on how G. Jackson wouldn't be of much help as he is not part of setting policies. Such bullcrap. And as the questions for the Branch representative go on, the RC determines that it's bullcrap. Good for them.
I do believe that Watchtower is going to find themselves being ruled against in severe manners for their arrogance to misrepresent their roles to judges.
Jump to the last few 3 or 4 minutes of the video to see that the RC is pissed at Jackson and his answers.