He just said the publications aren't a constitution, yet any JW disagreeing with them is subject to a JC.
Slippery so-and-so.
by umbertoecho 232 Replies latest watchtower scandals
He just said the publications aren't a constitution, yet any JW disagreeing with them is subject to a JC.
Slippery so-and-so.
Jacksons demeanor is holding but his reasoning is slipping on the question of who makes the ultimate decision should there need to be one.
I hope Stewart hammers on that more.