by scholar 23 Replies latest watchtower bible
Wow! Hey REM, we actually agree on something!
Jonsson was addressing the Watchtower's incorrect exegesis in the face of secular historical evidence.
I have not yet read Jonsson's book, but as I understand it, it really tears the WTBTS a new one with regard to the year 1914 and what the Society has always asserted about its significance. I am looking forward to reading it.
Are you jealous of my academic qualifications?
Scholar, my gramma was a strong, uneducated but common sensical woman who raised 10 children all by herself. She had a lyrical way of cutting through the bullshyte when she would say, regarding a person of your "stature", "that man is an educated fool". Her words, not mine.
Kind Regards,
Corvin
marked
Thanks Fisherman for re-raising this old pseudo-scholar thread. I needed a good laugh. Even the contrasting names of the so-called 'hypotheses' is misleading. Supposedly Furuli represents the whole of Oslo, whereas Jonsson is made to appear that disproving 607 is merely 'his' view. What utter rubbish.
