The Watchtower's Shameless Nazi-Milking

by metatron 36 Replies latest jw friends

  • metatron
    metatron

    I could easily reply that you might be living life ( if alive at all) under a swastika
    flag, if it weren't for the 'American mentality'!

    I am offended by the pro-Israeli lobby endlessly milking the Nazis to cover over
    every brutal thing they do. I am also offended by the Watchtowers milking of the Nazis
    for a similar purpose.

    If you are so worried about oppression in Europe currently, I strongly suggest you take
    a good hard look at what the EU bureaucrats have in mind. I wouldn't call them Nazis but
    they represent a far more ominious threat to personal freedom that any repellent skin heads.

    To repeat: wrong lesson from Nazis = behave like Nazis
    correct lesson from Nazis = behave with compassion and care for others, not of your
    race, religion, or ethnic background.

    It's not that difficult to see - unless the habit of Watchtower blinders gets in the way.

    metatron

  • GermanXJW
    GermanXJW

    So I wouldn't expect to find any Schindlers, Ten Boons,etc. in the ranks of the Witnesses. They were trying to save themselves.

    Nevertheless there were such cases: Hans Rosenthal later became a very famous quizmaster on German TV. He was a jew and persecuted during the Nazi regime (when he was not famous). In several interviews and documentaries he told how he survived because he was hid by a JW.

  • metatron
    metatron

    If true, good! That is EXACTLY the kind of compassion Witnesses need to emphasize in the
    modern day - not the clannish/selfish attitude that dictates the breakup of families
    and contempt for others.

    so be it

    metatron

  • Room 215
    Room 215

    German JW: May I suggest that the experience you relate serves to demonstrate that the only labels applied to humans that mena anything are ``decent" ``compassionate'', ``noble" etc. on the one hand, and ``hateful" ``spiteful", ``selfish", etc. on ther other.

    No religion, JW, Catholic, Buddhist, or other can claim a monopoly on basic human decency. It just so often seems that when one encounters a JW with a sensitive, charitable, highly-developed social conscience and non-judgemental attitude, it's usually in spite of, rather than beause of, his/her exposure to Watchtower teaching and worldview.

  • Fe2O3Girl
    Fe2O3Girl

    I was looking for someting else when I found this -

    http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/lancashire/archive/2002/02/02/LETFEATURES2ZM.html

    First published on Saturday 02 February 2002:

    The interview I just can't forget

    HOW many people do you suppose a reporter interviews in the course of half a century in journalism?

    More than 50,000? Perhaps 100,000? Probably somewhere inbetween, an average of between three and five a day.

    Why, then, does one particular interview or, rather, one particular interviewee stick in the mind? It was one of the briefest interviews I ever conducted. Yet I remember the time, I clearly remember the subject. I remember his name (though it was not an English name) and I can still see his face, particularly his eyes.

    And though the interview took place a quarter of a century ago, and lasted barely five minutes, hardly a year has gone by without the intensity and detail of that meeting returning to my mind many times.

    I never saw him again although I did try to find him because I knew he had an incredible -- probably an unbelievable -- story to tell. So why, among all those countless interviews with subjects from Prime Ministers to paupers, from sporting heroes to murderers, from world champions to pop stars, do I remember above them all a brief interview with a small, insignificant man you would barely give a second glance to in the street.

    Here is why. I was working at this newspaper's Burnley office at the time. We got a message that a man at the front counter was asking to see a reporter. I was free so I went down to see him.

    I was confronted by a remarkably small, wiry man. At a glance I could tell he was extremely agitated. His whole body was shaking and when I asked him how I could help him, he replied by holding out a newspaper in a hand he was incapable of keeping still and, with great effort, gasped out in a foreign accent: "Read that!"

    It turned out to be one of those religious newspapers which get pushed through your letter box and what had caught his eye was a story about Auschwitz, the notorious Nazi death camp. Well, not so much about Auschwitz but about some of the inmates in the camp where, among others, thousands of Jews were exterminated.

    The article claimed that inmates who were Jehovah's Witnesses were sustained by their faith, never lost their dignity and never sank to the depths of human degradation to which the thousands of other prisoners were forced.

    When I had finished reading it I looked up at my diminutive visitor. Tears were pouring down his face but his eyes had an incredible intensity. "My name," he said, "is Jan Kostilek."

    I will never forget what happened next. Slowly, he rolled up his sleeve and showed me a blue inscription on his arm. I had seen pictures of them before but never expected to see one in the flesh. It was the Auschwitz number the SS had tattooed on his arm when he arrived at the camp as a young man bound for the gas chambers.

    And here he was, still a broken man, standing before me more than 30 years later in an office in Burnley, able to speak briefly about those horrendous times for the very first time to put right what was, in his mind, a terrible and spurious wrong.

    "I was there," he sobbed. "And I can tell you that no one -- NO ONE -- was left with any dignity. We lived and died like rats. We all behaved like animals just to survive. No one was any different from his neighbour. This article is a downright lie! I just cannot let it go unanswered." His eyes blazed and his strength of feeling got to me. This small, incredibly thin man, who clearly had never recovered from extreme starvation and mistreatment, seemed to develop an aura.

    He exuded an emotion and a strength of passion and feeling I never experienced before or since. It was as if emotions of revulsion, horror and shame over what he had been reduced to and guilt over his survival had all burst from him at once.

    It overwhelmed him and he was unable to go on. So he left, refusing any help or comfort. I am a cynical old journalist but I'm afraid to admit that, later, I felt as though I had met a saint. I never could forget him. I never will.

    It was the nearest I came to the holocaust. It brought home to me what it did to those we regarded as fortunate enough to survive.

    Last weekend I watched a filmed re-enactment of a two-hour meeting at which the Nazi leadership, over a rich lunch, decided the fate of millions of Jan Kostileks. It was shown to commemorate Holocaust Day.

    I will never need a special day to remember Jan Kostilek. I knew that, if he was prepared, he had a terrible story to tell -- a special message for the world. I left three months for him to recover and knocked on his door. He had died three days earlier.

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    Fe2O3Girl posted an article:

    : ...

    : The article claimed that inmates who were Jehovah's Witnesses were sustained by their faith, never lost their dignity and never sank to the depths of human degradation to which the thousands of other prisoners were forced.

    : ...

    : "I was there," he sobbed. "And I can tell you that no one -- NO ONE -- was left with any dignity. We lived and died like rats. We all behaved like animals just to survive. No one was any different from his neighbour. This article is a downright lie! I just cannot let it go unanswered."

    This scenario is so typical of the lies that Watchtower propagates. By their definition, "we are a happy people" even if most JWs are in fact miserable. "JWs never lost their dignity" even though most of them "lived and died like rats" and "all behaved like animals just to survive". The memories of the few JWs who might have been treated far better than other prisoners because they were employed by, and therefore served the cause of, their Gestapo prison masters are irrelevant to the situation of the many who were not so lucky. Such memories are no more representative of the unlucky majority than are the pre-1914 memories of the rich elite that Watchtower likes to trot out to "show" how terrible things became after 1914.

    The Watchtower Society is a damned liar and is disgustingly self-serving.

    AlanF

  • GermanXJW
    GermanXJW
    The article claimed that inmates who were Jehovah's Witnesses were sustained by their faith, never lost their dignity and never sank to the depths of human degradation to which the thousands of other prisoners were forced.

    Do you know which article this refers to?

    It could be WT 1992 1/2:
    "In concentration camps, the Witnesses were identified by small purple triangles on their sleeves and were singled out for special brutality. Did this break them? Psychologist Bruno Bettelheim noted that they "not only showed unusual heights of human dignity and moral behavior, but seemed protected against the same camp experience that soon destroyed persons considered very well integrated by my psychoanalytic friends and myself."

    If that is the article it is not a statement of the WTS but a quote by Psychologist Bruno Bettelheim.

  • NameWithheld
    NameWithheld
    If that is the article it is not a statement of the WTS but a quote by Psychologist Bruno Bettelheim.

    Yes perhaps it was, but answer me this - was/is Bruno Bettelheim a JW himself? Associated in any way? Also, I would be interested to know where Bruno Bettelheim bases his assertation. Was he there in the camps to witness these events? I would trust an eye-witness over a someone who was passing on stories. Perhaps he was basing them on his interviews w/ survivors?

  • pettygrudger
    pettygrudger

    Interesting facts regarding Bruno Bettelheim - the WTBS EXPERT!

    http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9706/finn.html

    some highlights:

    When Bruno Bettelheim committed suicide in l990 at the age of 86 he had a towering and broadly based reputation: as a wise and humane child psychiatrist in whose Orthogenic School at the University of Chicago hundreds of severely disturbed children had been restored to normal life, as an expert on child-rearing in the Israeli kibbutzim, as a survivor of Buchenwald and Dachau whose writings had established him as an authority on life in the concentration camps, and as a specialist in the treatment of autistic children. Within weeks of his death, however, this reputation appeared to be in danger. Former students accused him in print of having created an atmosphere of terror in the famous school. Scholars accused him of plagiarism, and stories of falsified credentials and shoddy research emerged from several sources. The rise and decline of this remarkable reputation is now the subject of two major studies.

    His experiences in Buchenwald and Dachau, horrible though they no doubt were, also provided Bettelheim with grounds for further inventions, distortions, and exaggerations that formed the basis of his wide acceptance as an authority on the Holocaust and on the Jews role in their own destruction. He boasted of having been imprisoned because he was a member of the anti-Nazi resistance in Austria (no evidence). For all his claims of superiority to what he described as the general run of Jews who meekly submitted to being incarcerated by the Nazis, evidence shows that he offered no resistance when he was pushed into the railroad car. As anyone as well-connected as Bettelheim might have done, he managed to get money to bribe the guards and secure himself relatively safe and sheltered job assignments; a prominently placed American woman used her influence and ultimately got him released from the camps (he was later to claim that it was none other than Eleanor Roosevelt who secured his release).

    In 1943 Bettelheim published "Individual and Mass Behavior in Extreme Situations," a psychological study of concentration camp inmate behavior and attitudes that shocked a world that knew little about the camps and was not likely to question Bettelheims methods, theories, or conclusions. His claim to have lived in five barracks in ten and a half months and to have known personally fifteen hundred inmates, implausible as it may sound now, evidently convinced a stunned public that his evaluation was definitive. This article was reprinted in several of Bettelheims books and served as the basis of his lifelong reputation as an expert on the camps. In Pollaks judgment, it is "full of questionable generalities, invented research, glib psychology, and a good deal of fiction."

    Bettelheim never acknowledged or referred to the work of other survivors whose observations and conclusions differed from his own, and as the years went by he increasingly revealed himself as an angry anti-Semite. In a speech to Jewish students, Bettelheim posed the question "Anti-Semitism, whose fault is it?" and answered it himself. Pointing a finger at the audience, he shouted "Yours! . . . Because you dont assimilate, it is your fault. If you assimilated, there would be no anti-Semitism. Why dont you assimilate?" On a more theoretical level, Bettelheim wrote that to comprehend anti-Semitism "one must concentrate as much on the study of the Jew as on the study of the anti-Semite. The complementary character of their respective roles makes it apparent that the phenomenon is an interlocking of pathological interpersonal strivings."

  • GermanXJW
    GermanXJW
    When Bruno Bettelheim committed suicide in l990 at the age of 86 he had a towering and broadly based reputation: ...Within weeks of his death, however, this reputation appeared to be in danger.

    Interesting findings. But I find it strange that they had to wait until he was dead at age 86 and could no longer defend.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit