WT MAKES OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT

by DevonMcBride 38 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Jourles
    Jourles

    Just thought I would throw out here that I have not yet heard back from Joel on this case. He either did not receive my "comment" through their website, or he chose not to reply.

    Is there someone who would like to call him? I don't feel comfortable in calling. I feel like I would take away from his busy schedule.

  • Jourles
    Jourles

    OK, I just went to their website again and things look a little different now. Here is Joel's updated Bio page ---

    Notice the missing JW blurb? And if you scan the "Joel's Cases" articles, the JW's are not even mentioned, anywhere. I wonder if that case, since it was settled out of court, and as part of the settlement, restricted them from discussing it anywhere in public? Things that make you go hmmmm......

  • joenobody
    joenobody

    $1.55 million is the highest payout to date by WTBS? Any bets on how soon before that is topped with the impending child molestation suits?

  • minimus
    minimus

    Perhaps CONCERNED LAWYER can help!

  • Jourles
    Jourles

    Here is the latest and greatest news on this case:

    The largest settlement ever paid in the history of Jehovah's Witnesses occurred this past October, but no news outlet has yet reported it.

    The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, which is the umbrella organization over 6 million Witnesses worldwide, paid the estate of Frances Coughlin $1.55 million dollars rather than let a jury decide the wrongful death lawsuit.

    Frances Coughlin's surviving family sued Jehovah's Witnesses, also known as the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in State of Connecticut Superior Court at Milford (CV-00-0072183 S).

    The principle defendant was a "Bethelite," or full-time ministry worker, who drove recklessly in bad weather and killed Ms. Coughlin, a mother and grandmother, on October 8, 1998.

    That Bethelite Jordon Johnson was traveling between "Bethel," which has housing for its full-time workers in Patison, New Jersey and Brooklyn, New York, to a Witness Kingdom Hall he was assigned to in Derby, Connecticut.

    Johnson was found guilty of vehicular manslaughter, but only served 30 days in jail and was sentenced to two years probation. Subsequently, he and Jehovah's Witnesses faced a civil suit filed by Ms. Coughlin's surviving family for damages.

    Why was the Witness organization willing to pay more than $1.5 million dollars?

    Apparently because a much larger issue of "agency" was at stake.

    Agency is the word used to express a relationship between a principal party and its agent, through which the principal party projects its power and/or advances some purpose. And a principal party may be held liable for the actions of its agent.

    Jehovah's Witnesses contended that Jordan Johnson acted on his own and was not their agent at the time he caused the fatal car wreck.

    But plaintiff's counsel, Joel Faxon of Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, claimed on his client's behalf that Jordan Johnson was serving as a Bethelite and agent of the organization at the time and advancing their purpose, therefore Jehovah's Witnesses was responsible for his actions.

    Internal documents were obtained through the discovery process and testimony was given through depositions, which clarified and substantiated Faxon's view.

    I was retained as an expert witness and consultant for this case by the plaintiff's counsel.

    My role was to assist in the discovery process, provide research and generally help to form a basis for an understanding of how Jehovah's Witnesses employ, use and control Bethelites and others within their organization. Ultimately, I would have also testified as an expert in court.

    That testimony would have included explaining in clear terms how the organizational dynamics, indoctrination and objectives of Jehovah's Witnesses impact individual members and more specifically full-time workers such as Bethelite Jordan Johnson.

    But on the first day of trial Jehovah's Witnesses decided they didn't want a jury to decide this case and instead $1.55 million was paid to the plaintiff.

    The organization that claims it is waiting for the ever-eminent "end of the world" decided to settle in a pragmatic move to protect its long-term interests and more than $1 billion dollars of accumulated assets.

    Again, why would the Witnesses do this if they actually believed they had no meaningful liability?

    Certainly the cost to complete the case in court would be far less than $1.55 million dollars. Why not let the jury decide?

    But the seemingly shrewd Witnesses realized that there was just too much at stake and didn't want to risk a "guilty" verdict.

    Currently the organization known as Jehovah's Witnesses faces a growing number of lawsuits filed by former members who feel the organization has hurt them.

    The personal injuries were allegedly caused by elders and others acting in accordance with the organization's policies and doctrines, which include such matters as blood transfusions and sexual abuse.

    Seemingly to protect its assets the Watchtower Society of Jehovah's Witnesses and its many Kingdom Hall congregations have in recent years created a myriad of corporate entities to apparently contain liability.

    That is, each corporation is seemingly only responsible for its own specific actions and not the action of others. Again, this appears to be a rather pragmatic legal approach to protect the assets amassed by Jehovah's Witnesses over more than a century.

    But what if Jehovah's Witnesses are nevertheless responsible or liable for the actions of its agents, which would include elders and others throughout its vast network of districts and Kingdom Halls?

    Well, now you can see why the check was likely cut for $1.55 million in the Coughlin case.

    Jehovah's Witnesses were apparently concerned about what legal precedent a jury might set that could ultimately affect other claims pending or potentially possible in the future against the organization.

    Many people seem to think that Jehovah's Witnesses or the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society is focused on the end of the world and a coming kingdom. At least that's the impression many have when its members come knocking at the door.

    But through the Coughlin case a different view of the organization emerges, which looks more like a business protecting its worldly assets and focused on the bottom line.

    http://www.cultnews.com/2003_03_02_archive.html#90171324


    Did you notice the "Internal documents were obtained through the discovery process" part? It seems that Joel was handed a BOE letter and also some sort of bethel letter given to bethelites that reside there. The BOE letter states that ALL JW's are volunteers and do not have to attend meetings, field service, etc. But, the bethel letter is quite the opposite. It states that bethelites are REQUIRED to do the above mentioned items. Once these two conflicting letters came to light, the WTS snapped like a mousetrap and paid out. I should be getting these scanned documents soon and when I do I will post them up. I am also expecting roughly 150 or so BOE letters. They will also go up on the web for mass distribution. When they go up, it would be nice if everyone who can host them, do so. The more people who can spread these around the better.

  • Ravyn
    Ravyn

    <<<<Jehovah's Witnesses contended that Jordan Johnson acted on his own and was not their agent at the time he caused the fatal car wreck.

    But plaintiff's counsel, Joel Faxon of Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, claimed on his client's behalf that Jordan Johnson was serving as a Bethelite and agent of the organization at the time and advancing their purpose, therefore Jehovah's Witnesses was responsible for his actions. >>>>

    soooooo...they screwed him just like they screwed me! wow--it was the PLAINTIFF'S attorney who went after WTBS...interesting to find out how Jordan feels about WTBS now....how much you want to bet he is not only not a bethelite, but has been 'disciplined' in some way? I asked Carolyn Wah when she and some other guy(?) came to my hotel room that night and asked me to perjure myself, if they were going to take care of me if I went to jail for it and when she told me no way--that they should not even be in my room talking to me about it--I knew right then and there my life as a JW was over. I told the truth. less than three months later I was removed as a pioneer after 15 faithful yrs, supposedly for being gossiped against(?) and the whole incident has disappeared off the record books.

    so when you can't fight em......and you dont want to join em.....atleast level the playing field! I married into a slightly more powerful 'family'. My last name is Giuliani now. I finally feel safe again.

    Ravyn

  • bluesapphire
    bluesapphire

    WOW! This should stay on the top for a while! Thanks Jourles. Please continue to inform us.

    Ravyn, your story is amazing. Please tell us more.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    An excellent turn of events. Thanks, Jourles!

    Please, Ravyn, tell us more if you can.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    There is one thing I really want to make kinda clear regarding this civil case.

    I note that this counsel is claiming that "he" uncovered this evidence.

    I respectfully disagree.

    Some very helpful exJWs did the "dance" and got this counsel the evidence he needed. Without their evidence and their backed up written information evidence from the world's largest printing corporation showing that the person was working an "agent" working for the corporation, this lawyer could have lost the case.

    The combination of learned counsel, exJW and JW advocates and of course brave survivors make a huge amount of synergy in court that can make major lawsuit wins like this possible. Congratulations to every one involved.

    hawk

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit