If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

by DJS 508 Replies latest social current

  • Junction-Guy
    Junction-Guy
    When Kim Davis gets out of jail, I will personally go there and thank her.
  • Village Idiot
    Village Idiot

    Zimunzucz:

    "Simply put, the future generations of mankind derive no useful benefit from homosexuality. Traditional marriage is all about procreation and the viable continuation of our species."

    So you would prevent the marriage of a sterile woman or a postmenopausal one?

  • LoveUniHateExams
    LoveUniHateExams

    @VI - please don't give him ideas

  • Viviane
    Viviane
    Some day it may be legal for a man to marry a very young boy. It will not be considered illegal or child abuse.

    What does that conjecture have to do with reality?

  • SecretSlaveClass
    SecretSlaveClass

    VI:

    Seriously his views defy all logic. Great point BTW....

  • Viviane
    Viviane
    When Kim Davis gets out of jail, I will personally go there and thank her.

    Well, no one accused you of being smart with your time, so.... whatever.

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman
    You absolutely did make that assertion.

    That is not an assertion.

  • TakeOffTheCrown
    TakeOffTheCrown
    What does that conjecture have to do with reality?
    Viviane,

    What is the legal age for a male to marry another male? Is it sixteen, eighteen or twenty-one? Male to female marriage in some states is as low as 16. Can a male twenty-one years of age marry a male that is sixteen years old? If so, would this not be considered pedophilia or child abuse?

  • Viviane
    Viviane
    That is not an assertion.

    It 100% is, giving you a 100% failure rate on anything you say matching reality.

    noun
    1.
    a positive statement or declaration, often without support or reason:
    a mere assertion; an unwarranted assertion.
    2.
    an act of asserting.

    Now that reality shows you 100% made an assertion and were 100% wrong, why do you think you should be exempt from the consequences of your actions?

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman
    Lawrence v. Texas

    Prior to that 2003 ruling, homosexuals were criminals in 13 States and as early as 1986 the US Supreme Court did not find any Constitutional grounds to protect those "criminals."

    I do appreciate your research viv. I am not being sarcastic.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit