If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future (page 38)

From an impartial arbitrator position, I would deny her accommodation to remove her name and title from the documents. I don't buy it. That is what being replaced with somebody else is all about. Again, from such position, I would conclude that she wants that accommodation to use it as a device to manipulate the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriages. I would also conclude that she is using her antics about religion and conscience also as a device to manipulate the 6/26/2015 ruling on gay marriages.

Too bad the gays went after her, a trap . They should have waited until she was prosecuted or impeached. They may be able to still impeach her. She does not qualify anymore.

Fisherman

Viv, why didn't the AG prosecute her when the KY State attorney referred charges to him?

Village Idiot

What should have been done would have been to fine Kim Davis. It would have made her less of a martyr which is what the Fundamentalists wanted. Bad move on the part of that judge.

Viviane

Too bad the gays went after her, a trap . They should have waited until she was prosecuted or impeached.

Sorry, that sense none makes.

Viv, why didn't the AG prosecute her when the KY State attorney referred charges to him?

Great question and an excellent homework assignment for you since it's it's not my job to make you less uninformed! I look forward to you do absolutely nothing to figure this out for yourself and somehow thinking your laziness is everyone else's fault.

You may go now.

Fisherman

What should have been done would have been to fine Kim Davis

VI,Bunning said he would not do that because he believed others would pay her fines. A lot ot people have posted that if she cannot do her job, she needs to be replaced with someone that can, whether it is gay marriages or anything else. Gay marriage is not the issue. The issue is do your job

Fisherman

You may go now.

Here is why. No concurrent jurisdiction. It was being handle by another Court.

Thought you knew.

Fisherman

Sorry, that sense none makes.

Sure it does.

Village Idiot

Fisherman: "The issue is do your job"

I agree on principle but this situation has to be thought of as a chess game.

I didn't think of the idea that others might pay her fine but I would have welcomed that assuming that she could have been fined multiple times.

Viviane

Gay marriage is not the issue. The issue is do your job

Exactly. Now you're finally saying the same thing actual smart people have been saying, although I suspect you'll attempt to claim that's what you've been saying all along. Be warned, I will absolutely destroy that bullshit fiction should you attempt it.

Here is why. No concurrent jurisdiction. It was being handle by another Court

That reply isn't relevant to anything. I'm in no way surprised that what you write has nothing to do with reality.

Sure it does.

Well, that would be a first, but it isn't.

Are you done being 100% wrong an uninformed now? It seems that you're about to attempt to co-opt what every other smart and informed person has been saying and then attempt to claim that's been what you've been saying all along which, of course, is bullshit, but people try it anyway. I only ask because, if you're going to try something that dumb, what with history to prove you wrong and all, again, let me know so I can set aside five minutes for the response showing how dishonest you are yet again being since usually it takes no more than 30 seconds. I have to budget my time. I'm sure you don't understand, just nod as if you do.

If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

Share this