Language, language, language. This is just another example of how cults use language to reaffirm their agenda.
Another aspect of this "not perfect" defense is the language itself. "Perfect" implies an unreachable standard. Of course they aren't perfect. I mean, nobody is, right? "Perfection" is nearly impossible, so being less than perfect is acceptable to most people.
What does "not perfect" mean? Does it not mean FLAWED? But what's the likelihood that an active JW is going to say that the organization is flawed? That it's teaching have been or are currently flawed? Saying "we are not perfect" is much more palatable than saying "we are flawed". I can think of two reasons off the top of my head why this is so. One, nobody really expects a group to be perfect, so dismissing major screw ups becomes substantially easier when you write it off to "imperfection". It's a way to distance yourself from responsibility while seeming to be humble enough to admit error. After all, nobody is perfect, right?
Two, "not perfect" is a way to link the word "perfect" to your group without alleging to be so. "Flawed" is inherently negative, but "not perfect" still manages to put a positive spin on a negative. After all, nobody is perfect, right?
It's all about putting distance between the organization and responsibility and yet still managing to put a good spin on screw ups.
If I hear that argument one more time from my JW friend, I'll probably ask for rephrasing as I've done in the past, as I think it requires the person to really THINK about what they are saying. You know, what exactly does "not perfect" mean?
Yes, I suppose I'll hear the old, "we've made mistakes" routine that will float around indistinctly in the ether as though they were just some passing folly with no harm, no foul. As if the organization couldn't possibly be making mistakes currently... but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it!
I'm convinced. Start chipping away at the language... I think that's one of the best ways to undermine cult indoctrination.
Edited by - detective on 22 January 2003 13:41:35