Hi Gang, the following email thread isn't extremely funny, but it does give some interesting insight into the mind of a JW-wannabe.
I received the following:
Dear quotes,
The topic of rape came up in a family discussion. In my effort to find bible support, I found the bible the passage and I would now like to read the two pages you have on your web site. Unfortunately I have a filtered web server that blocks out objectionable material. Although I find this service protects me and my family sometimes it does to good of a job. For example, I can't go to any of your pages that have the words, sex, rape, etc. The rest are fine.
I was wondering if you could copy the text and email me back the info.
Yours truly
Seeking the truth and wishing to be baptized some day.
Andy
I could not quite tell exactly where this guy "was coming from", but here is response:
Dear Andrew [last name removed] Thanks for writing to us. We have attached two HTML files which contain the information you requested. We trust this will help you and your family. See you online!
Note, when I sent the above email, I included the folling HTML files:
A few days later, I received this from "Andy":
Dear Quotes,
Thank you for sending me the info regarding rape. your site has helped me greatly.
I read the following resolution and found it to be incredibly powerful.
*** The Resolution ***
WE JEHOVAH'S witnesses, met together in [City, State, Country], in one of the "Everlasting Good News" assemblies being held in a continuous chain around the whole world this year of 1963, do this day declare and resolve as follows:
_______________________________________________________As I mentioned before I'm not baptized and I currently do not fellowship with other witnesses. I guess you could call me a secret witness. I'm afraid to come out for fear of confrontation with my wife who I love. Trust me, we have had our disagreements over the years.
Am I correct in saying that I desired more food then what I was getting from the Official site of JWs? I guess the more I read the more questions I have. I'm hoping through knowledge I can arm myself with enough truth to not only come- out so to speak, but also to defend my beliefs against family and friends. I've believed the truth for almost 20 years now but I'm terrified to take that last step. I would like to pray that my wife would have a change of heart but yet I do not feel worthy of payer. I would like to tell my children the wonderful news that I've learned.
Thank you again for the information.
Andy
Here is my response to Andy:
Glad we could help, Andrew. Yes, the resolution is very interesting. Paragraph 5 in particular identifies the United Nations as being a human creation standing against God's sovereignty . Which makes it all the more confusing as to why the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society formerly allied itself with the UN by actively pursuing and achieving status as a "NGO". Rather unusual, since during that same period (the 1990s) Jehovah's Witnesses were not allowed to even be police officers, or seek out employment contracts with churches. And yet the Watchtower Society becomes a UN NGO. A very interesting situation, indeed. Tell me, when did you first become interested in JWs? What was your religious background before that?And here is the "head in the sand" response from Andy:
Wow,
You sure fooled me! Although I still feel your site will be valuable. As you said yourself, as a "study" for true witnesses. The question is, how much of your information has been changed. It's funny how your site was designed to lure people like myself. And once I got there it actually strengthened my belief in the message that the Witnesses are Gods true organization. Strange how things work out sometimes.
I was Catholic. I became brainwashed with the truth about 18 years ago.
Andy
Hurt and confused by Andy's accusations, I sent him this reply:
Andrew, I am sorry you feel I "fooled" you. I agree, our site is a study for both Witnesses and non-Witnesses alike. The Watchtower Society encourages people to study their publications, and our sight is sort of a scrap-book of clippings from Society publications. Nothing more, nothing less. No opinions (at least, none of my opinion, only the Society's). Funny how *if* my site openly criticized (by using my own words and editorial and drawing conclusions for the reader) it would be recognized as "opposing" and labelled as "entirely apostate lies", but when I take great pains to only provide direct, verified (and verifiable -- by you) quotes from the Watchtower Society, and let people draw their own conclusions, you feel it is a "lure". It seems a very unfair characterization. I try to be fair and reasonable, and am labelled a "lure". I strongly disagree with your label. Initially, the site was created because a dear friend was adamant in his claim that the Society *NEVER* claimed to be God's "channel" and God's "prophet". So I put together all the times when they said those exact things. The site grew from there. As to "how much has been changed" -- I encourage your scepticism! I have nothing to hide and know that *ALL* of the quotes are accurate and correct. I warmly challenge you to verify the accuracy of those quotes. You and I might disagree regarding the significance of the quotes, but you will find that the quotes themselves are accurate. If you find *ANYTHING* which is incorrect, email me at once so I can make the correction. (I have only had two minor typos pointed out to me in over 4 years). I am pleased that your faith has been strengthened. I know that has happened to many who have read the quotes at my site. I also know that many have been shocked upon learning about the embarrassing past of the Watchtower Society's publications, and have been moved to distinguish between loyalty and faithfulness to Jehovah God, and loyalty to a human organization. Why do you say you were "brainwashed" by the truth 18 years ago? Can I assume you are being facetious? Please enjoy my website. No matter what, you will find it interesting Sincerely, [email protected]
That's all folks, no reponse to this last one, and I don't expect one. The attitude seems to be "don't confuse me with the facts".
Edited by - Quotes on 24 January 2003 18:58:40