Where they are lovingly welcomed with open arms, right? LOL.
Lisa
Isn't that the POINT?? How do you think it is for minorities on predominately white colleges?
And who ever said that one race had the monopoly on being racist?? Not everyone feels like the people that brought the lawsuit in Alabama, the same as not everyone in the South opposed integrating the schools back in the sixties.
But, kinda on a tangent...did you know military universities aggressively recruit to meet racial quotas?
Check it out......
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/033/nation/West_Point_and_White_House_go_opposite_ways_on_diversity+.shtml
West Point and White House go opposite ways on diversity
By Wayne Washington, Globe Staff, 2/2/2003
ASHINGTON - The United States Military Academy at West Point sets goals to achieve racial diversity in its student body, a practice that the Bush administration has opposed in legal briefs filed in the affirmative action case at the University of Michigan.
Colonel Michael L. Jones, director of admissions at West Point, said the academy, which has trained such military luminaries as Douglas MacArthur and George S. Patton, sets a goal of having blacks make up 10 percent to 12 percent of its student population.
Bush administration lawyers said the effort for a targeted range of minority student enrollment at Michigan was akin to a quota system. Although West Point likewise sets specific recruitment goals, a White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, denied the two systems were similar.
''What we're addressing in the Michigan case is the University of Michigan's policies,'' McClellan said. ''It is a race-based policy. That was the wrong way to achieve diversity.''
There were no plans, he said, to challenge the admissions policies at West Point or any of the other service academies.
Unlike admissions officials at the University of Michigan, those at West Point offer no extra points in considering the applications of minority students. The Bush administration says that awarding points based on an applicant's race amounts to the establishment of a quota system, McClellan said.
At West Point, Jones said, admissions officials rely on aggressive, targeted recruiting that would increase the number of minority applicants who meet the school's rigorous academic and physical standards.
But supporters of affirmative action have said that even the stated goal of having African-Americans make up 10 percent to 12 percent of the student population at West Point would probably be impermissible if the courts rule the way the Bush administration urges them to in its briefs.
''It's remarkable that this administration hasn't questioned the affirmative action programs for our military academies,'' said Senator Edward M. Kennedy. ''Clearly, diversity in our military is a national priority. But it's also a national priority for our colleges and universities, which are the gateways to opportunity. If we followed the administration's policies, we'd be a lesser nation, a lesser society.''
The US Military Academy at West Point, the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., and the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo., are in unique positions. While public universities tend to be state entities that draw students from their area, the military academies take in students from across the country. And they serve as a major source of officers for the armed services.
In addition, military leaders have long stressed the importance of having the armed services reflect the diversity of the country they protect.
None of the military academies come close in that regard, and the Bush administration's brief makes it clear that the administration prefers race-neutral efforts.
That emphasis might seem like a conflict with having a stated percentage goal for a minority group, but Jones said West Point simply wants a diverse corps of officers. The extra recruiting efforts that target minority students have not drawn criticism from whites, Jones said, because they already know about opportunities at the academy.
Admissions officials at each of the academies have said they want a student body that is diverse, but only those at West Point have a specific range they want to reach.
''There's no need to have a target,'' said Rollie Stoneman, the associate dean of admissions at the Air Force Academy.
Stoneman said he and his colleagues also try to increase the number of applications they receive from minority students. But when he was asked why the Air Force Academy does not set goals in an effort to have its student population reflect the population, he said: ''We haven't needed it.''
Blacks, who make up slightly less than 13 percent of the US population, account for 5.6 percent of the student population at the Air Force Academy. Hispanics, 13 percent of the US population, are just under 6 percent of the student population.
At West Point, Hispanics are reported to involve 6.3 percent of the student population. Just over 8 percent are black.
Hispanics make up 8.2 percent of the student body at the Naval Academy. Blacks are reported to account for 6.1 percent of students.
Affirmative action supporters and even some who oppose focusing on race to achieve diversity say the Bush administration's briefs in the Michigan case tends only to confuse things.
''It's hardly a brief that a lot of conservatives wanted,'' said Abigail Thernstrom, a conservative member of the US Commission on Civil Rights. ''I think they've done something odd, which is to jump in but not really tackle the central issue.''
The briefs, one of which challenges the admissions policies at Michigan's law school and another that disputes its undergraduate admissions system, offers some comfort for both supporters and opponents of affirmative action.
At one point, Bush administration lawyers write: ''Measures that ensure diversity, accessibility, and opportunity are important components of government's responsibilities.''
But the lawyers also voiced criticism of race-based affirmative action programs, even those that would set goals rather than fixed targets. ''Like a quota,'' they said, ''a range ensures that a certain share of spaces will be allocated to a racial group, and that other students will not be eligible to compete meaningfully for those spaces solely because of their race.''
Debra Humphreys, who is vice president for communications and public affairs at the Association of American Colleges and Universities, said the Bush administration is trying to have it both ways: They tend to want to be seen as embracing diversity while striking at the heart of programs that achieve it.
''They've been boxed into a corner here,'' Humphreys said. ''The brief was a legal document but also a political one. They got out there and made both arguments.''
McClellan said Bush's position isn't contradictory: He wants diversity, but he doesn't want quotas to be used to achieve it.
As an example of how schools might reach diversity without the use of quotas, the briefs refer to the admissions policies at the state university systems in Florida, California, and Texas. Those systems guarantee admittance to students who finish at or near the top of their high school class.
Humphreys said such a program ''only works if you have segregated high schools. It's a very ironic argument to make.''
If colleges and universities took a percentage of the top high school students at racially diverse schools, they would get fewer minorities than they do now, Humphreys argued. With the continued segregation of many high schools, the top 10 or 20 percent of the graduating class will have little racial diversity. But if the school is mostly black or Hispanic, it could guarantee a college or university a large number of minority students.
McClellan said that argument has not been borne out by the results highlighted in the administration's briefs. Since Florida, California, and Texas modified their admissions programs to take the top students at their high schools in the states, the percentages of racial minorities they are enrolling has remained roughly the same, or has increased.
Jones said much more focus should be placed on the fact that all colleges and universities - not just military academies - are having too hard a time finding minority students who are prepared for college.
''Two years ago, less than 3,000 black males scored 1,200 on the SAT,'' he said.
''It is heartbreaking for me when I travel to see the lack of opportunity and lack of desire that engenders in some of these large inner-city schools. That's what has to be fixed in our country, to make this issue of goals go away.''
This story ran on page A12 of the Boston Globe on 2/2/2003.