"We would not refuse to treat one as a brother because he did not believe the Society is the Lord's channel... There should be full liberty of conscience." -- WT April 1, 1920, p. 100, 101
It is interesting to think that at one time the wt viewed itself merely as students of the word sharing and printing thier understanding or interpetation or their take on a biblical point and as a result they felt that if they printed something that someone didn;t agree with well all is well, we just got a different personal view on a matter
i have always stated that in my view wt would have been fine if they stuck with bible commentary, the problem grew we they decided to jump from just mere students of the word to the "HNIC"
as a result of this move they no longer could allow you to have a view other than theirs without saying that you are now going against god-
it has often been stated by many that their family have at times wished they commit fornication steal , get drunk etc for at least they could say you did it cause you were weak, but to speak against THE SOCIETY well that is equated with speaking against god himself
and that is why a DAing is often view worst cause you DELIBRATLY LEFT GOD -
and so over the years wt has gone from - sure you can have a different thought from us and still be cool with god to- YOU WILL DIE FOR DISAGREEING WITH US
when i show info like this to NONJW they are just amazed at how the wonderful couple they see on thier doorsteps on sat actually believe this tye of stuff,
only n wt world