Disfellowshipped for celebrating Xmas?

by Theburstbubble 41 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    A friend of mine who is still a witness told me that an elder had approached her and asked if we had celebrated Xmas and that if we did it was a DF offence as is classed as apostasy!

    ..............https://4d0850cecf2c5ce919d5-17b283ac00835b5ced4db83c898330a1.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/6774953_the-ultimate-no-life-test-the-app-that_8527071b_m.jpg?bg=7C7774

  • talesin
    talesin
    Wasanelder - my good friend moved away, partied like a rock star AND got an education while she was young, and has lived her whole life as a 'worldly' person. She moved back to the province a decade or so ago, but to another city, attends conventions. Her 'secret life' has never been found out. I'm happy for her, to tell the truth. She beat the system, and was smart enough to figure out how back in the 70s. xx : )
  • blondie
    blondie

    Christmas is a religious holiday officially whether you put Jesus into or not.

    But birthdays don't fit any category re holiday and is not listed as a df'ing offense in the elder's manual. But the WTS and elders make the rules.

    2 years...hardly...out 15 years, no visits for 5 years until last week. Didn't open the door just wave goodbye through the window. As long as the local elders know where you live, a contact attempt could still be possible.

  • Wasanelder Once
    Wasanelder Once
    Talesin, my point exactly! Love ya!
  • theliberator
    theliberator
    I would urge you to read the transcript of Jackson's testimony at the Royal Commission and have it ready to share with your elders. You should read the context. But here is what Jackson said, and I quote: " Yes, but if I could mention, Mr Stewart, your first 2 proposition you put forward, that they meet someone who is 3 celebrating Christmas ‐ you know, this person is not 4 associating with other Jehovah's Witnesses, not actively 5 trying to change other people, and so on ‐ a person such as 6 that is not going to be handled judicially, as far as 7 I understand."


  • rebel8
    rebel8

    They can do whatever they want, since they make the rules.

    It's not illegal for them to practice their religion, even if it involves changing other people's status. Example.

  • talesin
    talesin

    rebel8, that's cray-cray, BIG TIME.

    Wasanelder - backatcha, bro. : ))

  • clarity
    clarity

    6. Having a Christmas tree won’t necessarily get you disfellowshipped

    In the labyrinth of questions aimed at highlighting the shunning policy, Angus Stewart asked Geoffrey Jackson the following…

    So, for example, if they [a Jehovah’s Witness] had become inactive or sought to fade without formally disassociating, and the elders came to visit and found them celebrating Christmas or a birthday, they would be found to be in transgression of the rules, would they not?

    Jackson’s answer was remarkable…

    That is not my understanding. But again, as I said, it is not my field, that goes into policy with regard to those type of things, but from my personal experience, that’s not the case.

    Anybody who knows anything about the Witness faith knows that celebrating Christmas or birthdays is expressly prohibited for Witnesses – a “transgression of the rules” as Stewart carefully phrased it. In fact “celebrating false religious holidays” is clearly listed as a form of apostasy in the Shepherd book and deemed judicially actionable by elders.

    As with his earlier obfuscation about corporal punishment, Jackson’s ability to contort the truth so readily rather than take pride in teachings and practices that are supposed to be mandated by God will have been a huge wake-up call for any sincere Witnesses who dared to watch.

    clarity

  • clarity
    clarity

    Here's the web site.............................

    http://jwsurvey.org/cedars-blog/12-things-we-learned-from-geoffrey-jacksons-testimony-at-the-royal-commission/comment-page-1

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    I would urge you to read the transcript of Jackson's testimony at the Royal Commission and have it ready to share with your elders. You should read the context. But here is what Jackson said, and I quote: " Yes, but if I could mention, Mr Stewart, your first 2 proposition you put forward, that they meet someone who is 3 celebrating Christmas ‐ you know, this person is not 4 associating with other Jehovah's Witnesses, not actively 5 trying to change other people, and so on ‐ a person such as 6 that is not going to be handled judicially, as far as 7 I understand."

    They will just say it is not a "real" recording or transcript. It's photo shopped or fake. That's what was said here by a local Eldub.

    Good luck,

    Doc

    The greatest revenge is living a happy & successful life!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit